Trouble Understanding Bending Moments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter studentoftheg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bending Moments
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding bending moments in beams, focusing on their orientation and direction in relation to applied forces. Participants explore the concepts of bending moments, reaction moments, and the implications of different sign conventions in the context of beam mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in visualizing the direction of bending moments when a force is applied to a beam, specifically questioning the use of the right-hand rule.
  • Another participant suggests imagining holding the beam fixed and considering how to turn it to counteract the applied force to determine the orientation of the reaction moment.
  • There is mention of different conventions for bending moments, such as "sagging is positive" versus "hogging is positive," with a humorous analogy to a smiling face representing sagging.
  • Clarification is sought regarding the direction of bending moments, particularly how applying a force in one direction affects moments about different axes.
  • One participant visualizes the deformed beam to relate applied moments to bending, noting that a bending moment about the Z-axis results from bending in the XY plane.
  • Another participant confirms that applying a moment about one axis results in bending in the other two axes, indicating a relationship between the axes and bending behavior.
  • Links to external videos are provided for further exploration of bending beam concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the relationship between applied forces and resulting bending moments, but there remains uncertainty regarding the specific directions and sign conventions for bending moments. The discussion does not reach a consensus on these points.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about sign conventions and the interpretation of bending moments, which may depend on specific contexts or definitions not fully explored in the thread.

studentoftheg
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble fully understanding bending moments. I get the calculations, the force times distance (lever arm), and how to calculate the bending stress (M*y/I). Its the orientation/direction that I am having trouble picturing in my head. I know this is pretty basic, but I just haven't read or seen something that makes it 'click' in my head. Like say you've got a beam, and along the beam axially is the X axis, vertically Y axis and Z is the lateral direction. The beam is anchored at one end. If I apply a force to the other end, say Fz, how do I know what direction the moment is? Is it the right hand rule? Can someone explain. Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you talking about bending moments (within a beam) or applied/reaction moments (at supports/etc)?

Orientation of reaction moment
To find the orientation of the reaction moment in your example I imagine holding the beam where it's fixed and think how I would have to try to turn it to counteract the applied force.

Sign of reaction moment
If you have a feel for the orientation but don't know if it's +ve or -ve, use the right-hand rule as you suggested. In your example the reaction moment is about the Y axis, so put your thumb in the direction of +Y and your curled fingers show the direction of a positive moment.

Sign of bending moment
For bending moments it's less standardized. You can have "sagging is positive" or "hogging is positive". Sagging positive is common for mechanical engineering. When you're feeling positive you're smiling and your face looks like a sagging simply supported beam :P

Since you're bending in the X-Z plane it's more confusing. The "sagging is positive" convention means a positive bending moment is caused by a positive moment at the positive side of the point of interest, and a negative moment on the negative side. In your example the concavity will be in the direction of the +Z axis. So the bending moment about Y would be negative.

However then you can't use stress=My/I, but that's obvious because the stress is independent of the Y-coordinate for bending about Y.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I am talking about the bending moment within the beam as opposed to reactions at supports etc.
 
Anyone point me in the right direction here? Thanks
 
studentoftheg said:
Anyone point me in the right direction here? Thanks

Maybe my last paragraph was more confusing than anything. You have to first think through the process in a few different cases before you can form a mental image that you trust.

What in particular are you unclear on?
The signs?
Bending in the x-z plane instead of the usual x-y plane?
The meaning of "direction" for a bending moment?
 
Thanks for replying. I know this is pretty basic stuff! Yeah in particular its the resulting direction of the bending moments within a beam. For example, which direction would you need to apply a force to get a moment about Z etc?
 
studentoftheg said:
Thanks for replying. I know this is pretty basic stuff! Yeah in particular its the resulting direction of the bending moments within a beam. For example, which direction would you need to apply a force to get a moment about Z etc?


I always visualize the deformed beam, then it's obvious how that relates to applied moments.

A smiley face in the XY plane has a bending moment about Z. The direction of that bending moment vector depends on the sign convention - it could be +Z or -Z.

Are you clear that in your example the bending moment would be about Y?
 
Thanks, no that wasnt clear to me, that's what I'm having trouble processing and picturing in my head. So if it bends in XY axis then that is a moment about Z? And so I take it applying a moment about one axis then results in bending in the other two axis'? So if I applied a moment about Y, then it is going to bend in the XZ plane. Resulting in a smiley face laterally.
 
studentoftheg said:
applying a moment about one axis then results in bending in the other two axis'?

Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K