Trouble understanding - to + vs + to - current flow

AI Thread Summary
Current flow can be understood in two ways: from positive to negative, which is the conventional current direction, and from negative to positive, which reflects electron flow. In most modern physics and electronics contexts, current is defined as the flow of positive charge, while electron flow is opposite to this direction. In direct current (DC) circuits, current consistently flows from higher to lower potential, while in alternating current (AC) circuits, this potential alternates. It's important to note that while the convention is to use positive charge flow, some older texts may define current based on electron flow, leading to potential confusion. Understanding these conventions is crucial for clarity in discussions about circuitry and magnetism.
pecchiaw12
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When reading about directions of magnetic flux in relation to current flow on pages 6 to 8 of http://www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/Non-Ferrous-Magnet.pdf , I found that in figure 11 the current is traveling from + to - terminals, while in figure 12, the current flows from - to + terminals. I am still learning about the basics of circuitry and magnetism, and I want to understand why and how a current can flow in both directions.

Homework Equations


None that I know of. If there are some I would like to be enlightened.

The Attempt at a Solution


After reading this article "http://www.blueraja.com/blog/179/do...tive-to-negative-or-from-negative-to-positive" I found that from a Physics standpoint a current would travel from - to + in reference to electron flow, but in electronics it doesn't matter. Why doesn't it matter? Can a current move both ways or only one?
 

Attachments

  • 8.PNG
    8.PNG
    9.2 KB · Views: 421
  • 6,7.PNG
    6,7.PNG
    79.3 KB · Views: 461
  • 6,7.PNG
    6,7.PNG
    79.3 KB · Views: 447
  • Non-Ferrous-Magnet.pdf
    Non-Ferrous-Magnet.pdf
    2.1 MB · Views: 301
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you caught an error in the text! The two arrows in figure 12 should be reversed so that current will be flowing from + to - in the wires. The directions of the magnetic fields in fig 12 should also be reversed.
 
Oh, ok. Does this mean that currents ,in reference to an electrical perspective (as opposed to a Physics perspective), always travel from + to - in DC and AC currents, or are there exceptions?
 
As long as you take current to be in the direction that positive charge would flow, then current will always flow in a conductor from higher potential to lower potential. The + and - refer to regions of higher and lower potential respectively. This is true in both DC and AC circuits. In AC, the potentials of the two ends of a conductor are alternating in regard to which end is at the higher potential.

The usual convention in physics today is to take current to be in the direction that positive charge would flow, therefore opposite to the direction of electron flow. I believe that this is also the usual convention being used in electronics. However,some older texts take the direction of electron flow to define current direction. So, you have to be careful when switching between different books.
 
That makes sense. Thanks for setting things straight and informing me of the standard current conventions used today.
 
TSny said:
The usual convention in physics today is to take current to be in the direction that positive charge would flow, therefore opposite to the direction of electron flow. I believe that this is also the usual convention being used in electronics. However,some older texts take the direction of electron flow to define current direction. So, you have to be careful when switching between different books.
pecchiaw12 said:
That makes sense. Thanks for setting things straight and informing me of the standard current conventions used today.

It doesn't matter too much which one you use, as long as you state which and stick to it through out a given discussion when talking generally

but you need to know and understand that current IS the flow of electrons from negative to positive
This is because the electrons are the mobile charge carriers ... the positive ions in a wire don't move ! ... they are fixed in the atomic lattice of the conductor and don't go anywhere
The only real variation to this is when dealing with semiconductors where things get a little more complicatedDave
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top