Trouble with Gibbs Free Energy & Equilibrium Constant Calc.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of equilibrium constants using the Gibbs Free Energy equation, ΔG° = -RT * ln(K). The user expresses confusion regarding the appropriate ΔG° to use when altering the stoichiometry of a reaction, specifically the Haber-Bosch process (N2 + 3H2 ↔ 2NH3) with ΔG° = -33.0 KJ. It is clarified that changing the coefficients of the reaction affects the equilibrium constant, with a specific example showing that halving the coefficients results in a K value that is approximately 780 times greater. The user also questions the units of ΔG°, which should be KJ/mol when considering the stoichiometric coefficients.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gibbs Free Energy and its significance in chemical reactions
  • Familiarity with the Haber-Bosch process and its stoichiometry
  • Knowledge of equilibrium constants and their calculation
  • Basic grasp of thermodynamics and reaction kinetics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between Gibbs Free Energy and equilibrium constants in detail
  • Learn how to calculate Gibbs Free Energy of formation for various reactions
  • Explore the implications of changing stoichiometric coefficients on reaction kinetics and equilibrium
  • Investigate the units of thermodynamic quantities, focusing on KJ/mol for Gibbs Free Energy
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, chemical engineers, and researchers involved in thermodynamics and reaction kinetics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those working with equilibrium constants and Gibbs Free Energy calculations.

Electric to be
Messages
152
Reaction score
6
Hello. A known equation that is useful for calculating equilbrium constants is:

ΔG° = -RT * ln(K)

This is all well and good. Given a standard gibbs free energy of reaction for some given reaction, the equilibrium constant for the reaction can be found.

My trouble is in which ΔG° to use. For example given the following reaction:

N2 + 3H2 ↔ 2NH3 ΔG° = -33.0 KJ

The ΔG° can be calculated by taking the difference of Gibbs Free Energy of formation of each reactant and product, multiplying by the respective stoichiometric constant, and taking the difference.

Then, when I plug in this value for ΔG° I can find a unique equilibrium constant to describe this reaction.My trouble is the following. What's to stop me from halving all constants of the equation and getting this? :

1/2N2 + 3/2H2 ↔ 1NH3 ΔG° = -16.5 KJ

Now, per "mole" of the equation (which is 1/2 N2, 3/2H2 and 1NH3), there is one half of the original Gibb's free energy release. However, this still represents a standard gibbs free energy, by following the same process as before of taking the difference between products and reactants. However, I will certainly get a different value of K. The equilibrium constant should remain the same though, should it not? It shouldn't matter what multiple of the equation have. This is my confusion.As a side question, should ΔG° describing this type of reaction have units of KJ/mol? I know in the Gibbs free energy of formation it is. However, generally when I've seen free energy of reaction written it has only had units of J or KJ, since the moles were multiplied through in the process of finding ΔG°. If it does have KJ/mol units, would 1 "mol" of reaction essentially be 1 mol * each stoichiometric constant of the products and reactants for a given equation?
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Electric to be said:
The equilibrium constant should remain the same though, should it not?

\frac{[NH_3]^2}{[N_2][H_2]^3} = \sqrt{ \frac{[NH_3]}{[N_2]^{\frac 1 2}[H_2]^{\frac 3 2}}}
 
Use the ΔGo for the reaction of interest. Changing the coefficients of the reaction does change the reaction kinetics and the equilibrium constant. By dividing the Haber-Bosch equation (N2(g) + 3H2(g) => 2NH3(g)) by 2 effectively doubles the equilibrium constant value of the reaction. The equation which yields 2 moles NH3(g) has a KSTD = 1.64 X 10-6, but dividing by 2 => KNON-STD = 1.28 X 10-3.

[K(2NH3)]½ = [([NH3]2/[N2][H2]3)]½ = [K(NH3)] = [NH3]½/[N2]½[H2]3/2]
 
Correction... Dividing by 2 => increases K-value by ~780x. SBT
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K