Trouble with LAMMPS: Melting Gold at 100K?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hillgreen
  • Start date Start date
hillgreen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am an undergrad researcher trying to study the melting temperature of gold using an MD simulation with LAMMPS.
I'm trying to do some preliminary exercises to make sure that I understand how the program works. I'm working on finding the thermal expansion coefficient by heating up a 5 by 5 by 5 block of FCC gold (using the gold eam potential that came with LAMMPS) and measuring the lattice parameter at each temperature. Unfortunately, my sample seems to be melting at 100K :confused:. My units are set to real, which should mean that everything is measured in K. I've tried using nph and temp/rescale, npt, nve with press/brendensen and temp/rescale. All of these result in a complete loss of all crystal structure. I even tried just leaving the sample on NVT without modifying the pressure and it still melted. Any ideas as to why this is happening? Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure... I also use LAMMPS, though I don't have experience with the problem you're doing. I would suggest posting to the LAMMPS mailing list. It's really active, and the creators of lammps will help you out there. The link is on the main page.
 
Yeah, the LAMMPS mailing list is an active source for everything related. Since my problems are too cheap to use gold and haven't used it in anything, are you sure your system of units is selected appropriately with respect to the EAM potential (i.e. that it isn't given in metal units)?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top