How Can I Simplify an Equation Involving Levi-Civita Tensors and Indices?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on simplifying an equation involving Levi-Civita tensors and indices, specifically the equation $$C_1\partial_{\mu}G^{\mu\nu}+C_2\frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}\partial_{\mu}G_{\rho\sigma}=0$$. The goal is to eliminate the epsilon tensor from the second term while transforming the first term into the Hodge dual of $$G^{\mu\nu}$$. Participants suggest rewriting $$G^{\mu\nu}$$ in terms of its Hodge dual components and discuss the epsilon-delta relation in four dimensions to aid in the simplification process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Levi-Civita tensors and their properties
  • Familiarity with Hodge duals in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of tensor notation and index manipulation
  • Basic concepts of the Kronecker delta and its generalizations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Levi-Civita tensors in four dimensions
  • Learn about Hodge duals and their applications in tensor calculus
  • Research the epsilon-delta relation and its implications in tensor algebra
  • Practice index manipulation techniques in tensor equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of differential geometry who are working with tensor equations and seeking to simplify complex expressions involving Levi-Civita tensors.

PhyAmateur
Messages
103
Reaction score
2
I have an equation that says $$C_1\partial_{\mu}G^{\mu\nu}+C_2\frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}\partial_{\mu}G_{\rho\sigma}=0$$ If I want to get rid of the ##\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}## in the second term, I know I must multiply the equation by some other ##\epsilon## with different set of indices, but I could use some help in knowing what those incides must be to avoid repeating dummy indices and at the same time being able to end up with an equation with a new epsilon present in the first term (the one with ##C_1##). My aim from all this process is to convert the first ##G^{\mu\nu}## to ##\star G^{\mu\nu}##, i.e., the Hodge dual of ##G^{\mu\nu}##. Any tip will do it, thanks guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest starting by rewriting the ##G^{\mu\nu}## in terms of the components of the hodge dual, this should get you started.
 
Do you mean that ##\tilde{G}^{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}G_{\rho\sigma}##?
 
Yes, but if you want the left term to be expressed in the hodge dual, you need to invert that expression.
 
Yes, that is what I am having troubles in. To take the epsilon to the other side where the index placement is giving me a hard time.
 
I will give it a shot though I feel I am mistaken: Maybe, this would be more like: ##2\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}\tilde{G}_{\rho\sigma}=G^{\mu\nu}##? Is this by any chance correct? @Orodruin
 
How does the ##\varepsilon##-##\delta## relation look in four dimensions?
 
This part of the wikipedia entry on the Kronecker delta and its generalisation might help.
 
$$\epsilon^{\rho\sigma\mu\nu}\epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho'\sigma'}=-2(\delta^{\rho}_{\rho'}\delta^{\sigma}_{\sigma'}-\delta^{\rho}_{\sigma'}\delta^{\sigma}_{\rho'})$$

I hope this is what you mean as I am new to those terminologies and to differential geometry in general. Please bear with me @Orodruin .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K