Troubleshooting an Odd Square Wave Oscillator: A Scientist's Analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on troubleshooting a square wave oscillator schematic that failed to function as intended. Participants recommend using a 555 timer IC as a straightforward solution for generating square waveforms, highlighting its simplicity and reliability. Additionally, the 74HC4060 combination oscillator and divider chip is suggested as an alternative. The consensus is that many online schematics are unreliable due to their amateur origins.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 555 timer IC functionality
  • Familiarity with 74HC4060 oscillator and divider chip
  • Basic knowledge of electronic schematics
  • Experience with troubleshooting electronic circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the operation and applications of the 555 timer IC
  • Explore the features and uses of the 74HC4060 combination oscillator
  • Learn about common pitfalls in online electronic schematics
  • Investigate alternative square wave oscillator designs and configurations
USEFUL FOR

Electronics enthusiasts, hobbyists building oscillators, and anyone interested in reliable circuit design and troubleshooting techniques.

KoZuEst
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I found a schematic from the internet that was claimed to generate a square waveform at a decent frequency. I built the thing but it doesn't seem to work at all.

I'll attach a picture of the schematic. Could you tell me what's wrong with it and if there is any other relatively easy way to make a square wave oscillator?
I really don't like running to my electronics store to get every little component.. The clerk already knows me by name.. :D
 

Attachments

  • Squarewave.GIF
    Squarewave.GIF
    8.9 KB · Views: 528
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
You could just use a 555 timer IC -- that's a common way to do a simple oscillator. Or you could use a 74HC4060 combination oscillator and divider chip.
 
ok, thanks.

Heh.. I looked into it. I thought, it'd be a lot more complicated.
Thanks
 
Berkeman is right, much easier to use 555 and those "schematics" from the net usually never work, since they are put together by amateurs, not engineers.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K