Truss Prob: finding the force in a member

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving for the force in member HG of a truss using the method of sections. The participant calculated the force in member DG as 14.1 kN and attempted to find the force in HG, concluding it to be -20 kN. The challenge arose from the presence of a pulley system, which necessitated considering additional forces not initially accounted for. Participants provided guidance on incorporating the effects of the pulley and suggested using free body diagrams to clarify the forces acting on the truss.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium equations: ƩF(y) = 0, ƩF(x) = 0, ƩM = 0
  • Familiarity with the method of sections in truss analysis
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams (FBD) for structural analysis
  • Basic principles of pulley systems and their effects on forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of sections in truss analysis using examples
  • Learn how to effectively create and interpret free body diagrams
  • Research the impact of pulley systems on force distribution in structures
  • Explore advanced static equilibrium problems involving multiple forces and supports
USEFUL FOR

Students in civil or mechanical engineering, structural analysts, and anyone involved in solving static equilibrium problems in truss structures.

lazypast
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The diagram is attached. I must solve using method of sections the force in member HG.



Homework Equations


ƩF(y) = 0, ƩF(x) = 0, ƩM = 0


The Attempt at a Solution



My hand-drawn pic shows the section.
Solving vertically, ƩF(y) = 0
F(DG)cos45 = 10
F(DG) = 14.1kN

Moments about E
10(2) + 2F(DG)cos45 + 2F(HG) = 0
Dividing by 2 and rearranging:
F(HG) = -10 - 14.1cos45 = -20kN



I don't think I'd have a problem if there wasn't a pulley system and I can only assume the reason I'm not getting the correct answer for F(HG) is because I'm not taking into account the effect the pulley has.

Can anyone advise a nudge in the right direct... ?
 

Attachments

  • IMG00048-20121126-1330.jpg
    IMG00048-20121126-1330.jpg
    21.5 KB · Views: 724
  • IMG00049-20121126-1336.jpg
    IMG00049-20121126-1336.jpg
    53 KB · Views: 597
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, what effect does the pulley have on the truss? Can the pulley be replaced by equivalent forces at the end of the truss?
 
Your free body diagram looks right. Now take a moment around G to find what member DE is. Next, sum the forces in x and y to find DG and GH.

Was I helpful to you with this? I really struggled with trusses in statics and now have a really good understanding of how to solve these problems.
 
In your free body diagram you need to identify the value of the horizontal force at the top of the pulley. What do think that is? (in theory, and in reality)
 
I have attached my workings out to find the reactions at the supports. Originally I was taking the total external forces at face value (i.e 10kN vertically down) but now I can see because the pulley system support is not connected to the structure there are extra forces.



Going back to the original FBD, I'll add and resolve with a horizontal force of 10kN in there, too. I've attached my workings out.
 

Attachments

  • Reactions.jpg
    Reactions.jpg
    20.2 KB · Views: 576
  • IMG00051-20121129-0907.jpg
    IMG00051-20121129-0907.jpg
    21.8 KB · Views: 565
Reactions look good, but meanings of F1 F2 and F3 not well-defined.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K