Trying to find an alternative for solving an integral

  • #1
JD_PM
1,131
158

Homework Statement



Captura de pantalla (522).png


Homework Equations



Captura de pantalla (524).png


The Attempt at a Solution



Captura de pantalla (528).png

[/B]
I understand how the integral is solved using cartesian coordinates.

However, I wanted to try to solve it using polar coordinates:

$$\int_0^{\pi/2} cos \theta \sqrt{1+r^2 cos^2 \theta}d \theta\int_{0}^{\sqrt{1-r^2 cos^2 \theta}}r^3dr$$

But it doesn't seem to be a good idea.

Am I wrong or we cannot find a better method than cartesian coordinates for solving this integral?
 

Attachments

  • Captura de pantalla (522).png
    Captura de pantalla (522).png
    2.6 KB · Views: 611
  • Captura de pantalla (524).png
    Captura de pantalla (524).png
    6.1 KB · Views: 571
  • Captura de pantalla (528).png
    Captura de pantalla (528).png
    8.7 KB · Views: 940
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
JD_PM said:

Homework Statement



View attachment 240513

Homework Equations



View attachment 240514

The Attempt at a Solution



View attachment 240515
[/B]
I understand how the integral is solved using cartesian coordinates.

However, I wanted to try to solve it using polar coordinates:

$$\int_0^{\pi/2} cos \theta \sqrt{1+r^2 cos^2 \theta}d \theta\int_{0}^{\sqrt{1-r^2 cos^2 \theta}}r^3dr$$

But it doesn't seem to be a good idea.

Am I wrong or we cannot find a better method than cartesian coordinates for solving this integral?

Your last integral with respect to ##r## also has ##r## in the upper limit; that is meaningless. Not only that, your first integrand (for the ##d \theta## integral) still has an ##r## in it, but that ##r## is nowhere integrated out.
 
  • Like
Likes JD_PM
  • #3
Ray Vickson said:
Your last integral with respect to ##r## also has ##r## in the upper limit; that is meaningless. Not only that, your first integrand (for the ##d \theta## integral) still has an ##r## in it, but that ##r## is nowhere integrated out.

Is it meaningless because polar coordinates doesn't apply here or because I made a mistake changing coordinates?
 
  • #4
JD_PM said:
Is it meaningless because polar coordinates doesn't apply here or because I made a mistake changing coordinates?
Well, let's see: for ##dA = dx \, dy##, ##dA## becomes ##r \, dr \, d \theta## and so
##x \sqrt{1+x^2} \, dA## becomes ## r \cos(\theta) \sqrt{1+r^2 \cos^2(\theta)}\, r \, dr \, d\theta, ## with ##0 \leq r \leq 1## and ##0 \leq \theta \leq \pi/4.## You could do the ##r##-integral (with ##\theta## fixed) to get a function of ##\theta## that would then need to be integrated over ##\theta## from 0 to ##\pi/4##; or, you could do the ##\theta##-integral (with fixed ##r##) to get a function of ##r## that would need integrating from 0 to 1. In either case you would not get what you wrote.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes JD_PM

Similar threads

Back
Top