MHB Trying to reverse structure a calculation to arrive at original variable

AI Thread Summary
To reverse-calculate the original variable A from the known value B, the equation B = (A x 0.0175) + A can be simplified to 1.0175A = B. By isolating A, dividing both sides by 1.0175 yields A = B / 1.0175. This method allows for the determination of A when B is known and the multiplier of 0.0175 is constant. The calculation effectively demonstrates how to derive A from B using basic algebraic manipulation.
lsargent
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Trying to reverse-calculate an equation to achieve one of the original variables when not present.

1) You have a number... A (which is always a positive number)

2) A is multiplied by 1.75%

3) This result is then added to A, and the resulting sum being B, i.e. (A x 0.0175) + A = B

In my scenario, the 0.0175 multiplier is known and is constant. Also, value B is known. I'm struggling to reverse structure this equation to arrive at A.

Any help/insight would be greatly appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What you have after combining like terms is:

$$1.0175A=B$$

And so dividing both sides by 1.0175, you obtain:

$$A=\frac{B}{1.0175}=\frac{400}{407}B$$
 
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top