Tschirnhausen Curve: Finding Tangents at a Given Point

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tc903
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Tschirnhausen curve and the process of finding tangents at a given point, specifically at (1,2). The user successfully derived the tangent line as $$\frac{9}{4}x-\frac{1}{4}$$ but encountered issues identifying points with horizontal tangents. The correct horizontal tangent points were determined to be $$(-2,2)$$ and $$(-2,-2)$$ after addressing the implicit differentiation correctly. The key takeaway is the importance of avoiding division by zero during derivative calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Implicit differentiation techniques
  • Understanding of the Tschirnhausen curve
  • Knowledge of finding tangents to curves
  • Basic algebra for solving polynomial equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study implicit differentiation in depth
  • Explore the properties of the Tschirnhausen curve
  • Learn how to identify horizontal tangents in polynomial functions
  • Practice sketching curves and their tangents using graphing tools
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced calculus concepts, particularly those focusing on curve analysis and tangent line calculations.

tc903
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Are the given families orthogonal trajectories of each other?

$$ {x}^{2}+{y}^{2} = ax $$
$$ {x}^{2}+{y}^{2} = by $$

I first started by finding them implicitly.

$$ \frac{2x+a}{2y} = y' $$
$$ \frac{2x+b}{2y} = y' $$

Then the problem wanted me to sketch my answer.

The Tschirnhausen, I solved. I just would like a better explanation.

$$ {y}^{2} = {x}^{3}+3{x}^{2} $$ Given $$\left(1,2\right)$$ find the tangent.

I found the tangent line. $$\frac{9}{4}x-\frac{1}{4}$$

Then the points where there was horizontal tangent. I take the terms in the numerator and set it equal to zero. $$ 3{x}^{2}+6x = 0 \implies 3x\left(x+2\right)=0 \implies x = 0, -2$$ Then I would substitute those values in for $$x$$ as my answers, but that is wrong, at least when $$x = 0$$. My answer should be $$\left(-2,2\right) and \left(-2,-2\right)$$. I was just wondering what I am missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
The short answer to your question about the Tshirnhausen curve is that when finding the derivative by implicit differentiation, you must not, as always, divide by 0. So if y is 0 your expression for y' is not right. The longer answer follows:

b67dit.png

dy23q1.png

1t2za0.png


69137d.png


2wfmoh5.png


28s2f6e.png


25z10lw.png
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
933
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K