Tug of war weight bias vs seated tug of war

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ryanj42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bias Weight
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the weight bias in tug of war competitions, specifically comparing traditional standing tug of war to a seated format. It is established that a heavier competitor, such as a 100kg individual, generally holds an advantage over a lighter opponent, like a 70kg individual. The hypothesis presented suggests that transitioning to a seated tug of war could reduce this weight bias, although it may not eliminate it entirely. The example of a 100kg man on ice versus a 50kg child on firm ground illustrates that environmental factors can also influence outcomes, potentially favoring the lighter competitor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of weight classes in competitive sports
  • Basic knowledge of physics principles related to force and friction
  • Familiarity with tug of war rules and formats
  • Concept of leverage and its impact on strength dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of force distribution in tug of war scenarios
  • Explore the effects of surface friction on competitive sports outcomes
  • Investigate variations of tug of war, including seated formats
  • Examine case studies of weight bias in other sports, such as wrestling
USEFUL FOR

Sports scientists, coaches, athletes, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of weight bias in competitive events like tug of war.

ryanj42
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I saw a thread previously created but locked, and I do understand many events like the tug of war, and wrestling have a huge bias to weight.

100kg guy vs 70kg guy. The 100kg guy only needs to push around 70kg and visa versa. I do understand the 70kg guy could be stronger, but generally speaking the bigger guy has the advantage.

So I was thinking. Suppose you changed the tug of war to seated, how much (approx maybe) bias would be removed from the difference in weight. Does a seated tug of war equal things out and by how much?

My initial hypothesis is that the bias would be reduced partially.

Additionally, if you were both to sit in chairs facing each other and backs to the chair with a one arm pull, would this completely eliminate the bias in weight. Well at least until their arm was extended and you had to pull them out of the chair. But I'm thinking as their arm extended, they would have more strength at that point and pull you back.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ryanj42 said:
I saw a thread previously created but locked, and I do understand many events like the tug of war, and wrestling have a huge bias to weight.

100kg guy vs 70kg guy. The 100kg guy only needs to push around 70kg and visa versa. I do understand the 70kg guy could be stronger, but generally speaking the bigger guy has the advantage.

So I was thinking. Suppose you changed the tug of war to seated, how much (approx maybe) bias would be removed from the difference in weight. Does a seated tug of war equal things out and by how much?

My initial hypothesis is that the bias would be reduced partially.
Let's suppose in a tug of war we have a 100 kg man holding the rope on one end and a 50 kg child holding the rope on the other end. The rope is initially slack. The man is standing on a very slippery ice surface, and the child is standing on firm rough ground. The official gives the start signal. Who will win? As a betting man, my money's on the kid.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters, billy_joule and sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K