Calculating the Frequency of a Tuning Fork Using Resonance Tube Method

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the frequency of a tuning fork using the resonance tube method, with air column lengths of 48.5 cm and 68.7 cm at 26˚C. The speed of sound in air is approximated at 346.6 m/s, and the wavelength is determined to be half the difference between the two resonance lengths. The formula for the speed of sound is provided, linking it to temperature, and the relationship between frequency and wavelength is highlighted. The calculated frequency of the tuning fork is approximately 857.4 Hz. Understanding whether the tube is open or closed is noted as a potential factor in the calculations.
Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
6. A tuning fork is heard to resonate over a resonance tube when the
air column is 48.5 cm long and again when it is 68.7 cm long. What is
the frequency of the tuning fork if the temperature is 26˚C?

I couldn't figure out how to work this. I thought it mattered if it were in a closed or open pipe, which is not mentioned.

v = 346.6 m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I had a problem that was similar to this...if I recall correctly, lambda was .5(D2-D1). So lambda is half the distance between resonances.

>_> However, I am not an expert and could very easily be wrong.
 


Foxhound101 said:
I had a problem that was similar to this...if I recall correctly, lambda was .5(D2-D1). So lambda is half the distance between resonances.

>_> However, I am not an expert and could very easily be wrong.

Don't I have to know if it's open or closed?
 


lambda = 2 (l2 - l2) - .404 m

v = 346.4 ms^-1

f = 857.4 Hz
 


First you ll need to get the v-air which is given by: v = (332.5)(squareroot(T/273))
where T is the temperature in Kelvin. After that you know that v = f x lambda, and now i think: Ln+1 - Ln = 1/2 lambda.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
31K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K