Turboencabulation App: Calculate & Display Percent Realization

  • Thread starter Thread starter anorlunda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    App
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the request for an application capable of performing turboencabulation calculations, specifically measuring inverse reactive currents in unilateral phase detractors and displaying percent realization. The conversation touches on both the technical requirements for such an app and the historical context of turboencabulation technology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks an app for turboencabulation calculations, mentioning specific technical components like laser stabilized anti-gravid marzelvanes and the need for either iOS or Android compatibility.
  • Another participant notes that the technology may be unfamiliar to many members and references an article about prototype devices under development.
  • A later reply humorously suggests that the lack of responses may be due to the upcoming date of April 2nd, implying a connection to April Fools' Day.
  • Another participant acknowledges the humorous nature of the original request and reflects on the absurdity of the topic.
  • A participant provides historical context, mentioning that the concept of turboencabulation dates back to 1944 and cites the original technical description by John Hellins Quick.
  • One participant shifts the discussion to inquire about a specific electronic component, the Signetics 25120, indicating a potential connection to the previous post.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the seriousness of the original request, with some treating it humorously while others acknowledge its historical significance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the actual need for an app and the feasibility of turboencabulation calculations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to historical figures and concepts that may not be widely understood, indicating a potential limitation in shared knowledge among participants.

anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
11,326
Reaction score
8,755
I'm looking for an app to do turboencabulation calculations for me in the field. In layman's terms I need to measure inverse reactive currents in unilateral phase detractors and to display percent realization.

To make it clear, I have six laser stabilized anti-gravid marzelvanes attached to the ambifacient wane shafts to prevent internal precession. Excitation is either sinusoidal or cosinusoidal.

Either an IOS or Android version of the app would be helpful. Unfortunately, searches of the app stores were not productive. Perhaps I'm using the wrong search terms. Can anyone help?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The technology referred to may be unfamiliar to most PF members .

To introduce the subject here is an article showing some prototype devices under development .

Interest in this work has waned in recent years due to most of the design team being locked away indefinitely in the parish asylum .
 
Last edited:
Never mind - it will be April 2nd in just a few hours time here in UK - then we'll have to be sensible again .

Strange to have gotten no more responses to @anorlunda's post though .
 
I knew there was a reason I voted for @anorlunda . I couldn't come up with something that silly. Reality would sneak in and ruin it all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
I would love to claim credit, but it dates back to 1944, the year I was born.

[PLAIN]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turboencabulator said:
The[/PLAIN] original technical description of the "turbo-encabulator" was written by British graduate student John Hellins Quick (1923-1991). It was published in 1944

See also
 
Last edited by a moderator:
On a more serious note, has there been anything developed to replace the Signetics 25120? I am having a hard time finding that original part.
-
Edit: Oh wait, I think a clue might be in post #5.
 

Similar threads

Requesting suggestions for languages, libraries, and architectures for parallel (and sometimes non parallel) numerical and scientific computations
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K