High School Turn one vector into another vector

  • Thread starter Thread starter askmathquestions
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
Click For Summary
To transform vector x into vector y using a square matrix T, the equation Tx = y must hold true. In the 2x2 case, this results in two equations with four unknowns, allowing for flexibility in defining the components of T. Various restrictions can be applied to the matrix, such as making it unitary, symmetric, or skew-symmetric, depending on the specific problem requirements. An alternative approach involves expressing the vectors in polar form and utilizing a rotation matrix followed by a scaling transformation. Ultimately, the choice of conditions for T should align with the context of the transformation needed.
askmathquestions
Messages
65
Reaction score
6
This might seem like a novice question, but let's suppose we have a vector ##x## and we want to turn it into vector ##y##. Well, what square matrix multiplied on ##x## accomplishes this?

As an example, let's work with a ##2 \times2## case:

##x = \begin{bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{bmatrix}## and ##y = \begin{bmatrix} y_1 \\ y_2 \end{bmatrix}##, then what transform ##T = \begin{bmatrix} t_{1,1} & t_{1,2} \\ t_{2,1} & t_{2,2} \end{bmatrix}## makes the equation ##Tx = y## true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
askmathquestions said:
This might seem like a novice question, but let's suppose we have a vector ##x## and we want to turn it into vector ##y##. Well, what square matrix multiplied on ##x## accomplishes this?

As an example, let's work with a ##2 \times2## case:

##x = \begin{bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{bmatrix}## and ##y = \begin{bmatrix} y_1 \\ y_2 \end{bmatrix}##, then what transform ##T = \begin{bmatrix} t_{1,1} & t_{1,2} \\ t_{2,1} & t_{2,2} \end{bmatrix}## makes the equation ##Tx = y## true?
Well,
##\begin{bmatrix} y_1 \\ y_2 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} t_{11} & t_{12} \\ t_{21} & t_{22} \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{bmatrix}##

So
##y_1 = t_{11} x_1 + t_{12} x_2##

##y_2 = t_{21} x_2 + t_{22} x_2##

You have two equations in four unknowns so you can set some conditions on T if you like. But that's the proceedure.

-Dan
 
This is where I got stuck, because how do we solve for the ##t_{i,j}## components? Or, what conventional restrictions are there?
 
askmathquestions said:
This is where I got stuck, because how do we solve for the ##t_{i,j}## components? Or, what conventional restrictions are there?
You have two equations in four unknowns. So you can solve for two of the in terms of the remaining two unknowns. So you can set two more conditions.

There are a number of restrictions you can impose. You can set T to be unitary, det(T) = 1, Tr(T) = 0, you can make T symmetric or antisymmetric, skew-symmetric, etc. Or you could just simply say, "I want ##t_{11} = \pi## and ##t_{21} = 0##." As long as you don't run into a contradiction you can do just about anything you like. Of course you would want to tailor your conditions to whatever problem you are working with.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes Hall and malawi_glenn
One approach would be to express the vectors in polar form:
$$\vec v_1 = (x_1, x_2) = (r\cos \theta, r\sin \theta)$$$$\vec v_2 = (y_1, y_2) = (R\cos \phi, R\sin \phi)$$Then the rotation matrix for the angle ##\phi - \theta##, followed by the identity matrix multiplied by ##\frac R r## would do the trick.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K