We know that the twin paradox is not a paradox since one of the twins accelerate and time passes more slowly for him relative to his twin on earth. My question is why can't we apply the same reasoning for length contraction? If one of the twin A measures the lengths of sticks in the reference frame of B, why shouldn't B measure the length of sticks of A to be longer? My approach is natural motion is to remain unaccelerated, and acceleration causes the shortening of the sticks.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Twin paradox and length contraction

Loading...

Similar Threads - Twin paradox length | Date |
---|---|

B Lag of a clock coming back to its initial position (Twins Paradox) | Mar 7, 2018 |

I Scientific American on the Twin Paradox | Feb 21, 2018 |

I Does the "space twin" benefit from length contraction? | Dec 9, 2017 |

Twin paradox without length contraction | Feb 22, 2010 |

Curtailed length and the twin paradox | Sep 25, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**