The discussion revolves around the Twin Paradox and the application of Bondi K-Calculus, specifically focusing on how the age difference between two twins, A and B, is perceived depending on who sends the signal during their journey. The scope includes theoretical considerations and interpretations of relativistic effects.
Participants express disagreement regarding the interpretation of Bondi K-Calculus in the context of the Twin Paradox, with no consensus reached on the correct application of the theory or the implications of signal sending.
Limitations include the lack of specific details about the journey and the conditions under which the twins are compared, as well as the assumptions made about the symmetry of the scenario.
You need more details here tooMohammad Fajar said:If two twin A and B make a journey
True. I assumed he was talking about a twin paradox scenario. If there's no return leg then the situation may well be symmetric.Dale said:You need more details here too
One thing that you need to understand from the outset is that standard approaches are standard for a reason: they work. If you think that you have found a mistake in a standard approach then >99% it is your mistake. Please post accordingly. For example “When I try to use Bondi K-Calculus somehow it seems to depend on who sends the signal”Mohammad Fajar said:Bondi K-Calculus very depend on who was send the signal.
Mohammad Fajar said:Bondi K-Calculus very depend on who was send the signal. If two twin A and B make a journey, A send a signal and B receiving the signal then yes after the journey A will see B younger, and this applied too for the case B sending a signal and A reflecting, then after the journey A will younger.