I Two axis motion for any vehicle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the types of motion in various vehicles, highlighting that aircraft exhibit yaw, pitch, roll, and forward velocity, while locomotives primarily have forward velocity. Cars and boats also experience yaw and forward velocity, but they can exhibit roll and pitch during maneuvers like turning and acceleration. The conversation emphasizes that all vehicles can engage in two-axis motion combinations, particularly in aerobatic planes during maneuvers like snap rolls and tumbles. Examples from aerobatic planes, such as the Citabria and Pitts Special, illustrate how these vehicles can demonstrate complex motion involving yaw, roll, and pitch. Ultimately, the discussion underscores that while vehicles may seem limited in motion types, they can perform a variety of complex movements under specific conditions.
Anand Sivaram
Messages
90
Reaction score
43
This question I have been thinking for some time.
1. For an Aircraft we have 4 types of motion. Yaw, Pitch, Roll and Forward Velocity.

2. For a Locomotive, we can say there are only Forward Velocity. No other axis of motion.

3. For a Car, we have the Forward Velocity and Yaw motion (steering control). For a boat also it would be similar.

Now, the question is do we have any vehicle which could do Two axis motion like (Yaw, Pitch), (Yaw, Roll), (Roll Pitch)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anand Sivaram said:
3. For a Car, we have the Forward Velocity and Yaw motion (steering control). For a boat also it would be similar.

Actually, cars and boats have all three rotational motions maybe not as noticeable. Car roll in turns and pitch during acceleration and braking. Boats especially sailboats roll and pitch depending on the seaway.

You refer to yawing as related to steering but planes can fly in a direction they are not pointed. Car yaw while skidding.
 
  • Like
Likes Anand Sivaram and Lnewqban
All those axes and directions are imaginary and pre-made conventions.
Please, see:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degrees_of_freedom_(mechanics)

Like any other body subjected to external forces, a vehicle moves and rotates in one instaneous unique way, which we like to divide into axes components.

A vehicle lacking sprung suspension and moving on a perfectly flat surface, like a frozen lake, could only have freedom to yaw.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Anand Sivaram
Anand Sivaram said:
Now, the question is do we have any vehicle which could do Two axis motion like (Yaw, Pitch), (Yaw, Roll), (Roll Pitch)
When an airplane (hopefully an aerobatic plane) does a snap roll or spin, it is doing these kind of combinations. At the start of the spin, the nose of the aircraft drops down and to the side with a definite yaw component. But once fully developed, the axis of rotation is primarily up and to the rear - so it is a yaw/roll combination.

Spin demonstration (video).

I looked at several snap roll videos, looking for one where the rotation axis is clearly not just a roll. As it turns out, the Citabria, the plane that I practiced in, demonstrates this better than the others. It seems to hold the yaw component for the the full duration of the snap roll instead of spending a lot of time transitioning into and out of a regular roll.

Citabria snap rollThis next one shows a 10-minute "aerobatic workout" with the Citabria - there are no snap rolls.
It shows simple "clearing turns" (used as a safety check), some "ballistic rolls", and some maneuvers that start out as pitch changes. Notice that even with the clearing turns, the plane rolls into the turn - so there is both a yaw and roll component even with that simple maneuver. It's actually difficult to do a pure roll in the Citabria.

Citabria Aerobatic Workout

Finally, I have never "tumbled" a plane, but some aerobatic planes are rated for them.
Entry to this maneuver is most often with a vertical climb - allowing the plane to loose air speed without stalling. As the plane nears zero vertical velocity, some combination of abrupt control inputs are applied (rudder, pitch, and/or aileron) - but typically with a plan to avoid a tail slide. One plane that's rated for this is the Pitts Special - the closest thing to a bumble bee in human transportation.

Pitts Special Tumble

Another Pitts Special tumble - this time from the spectators view.

Ground view of Pitts Special tumble.
 
  • Like
Likes Anand Sivaram and Lnewqban
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top