Two cards are drawn from a deck without replacement

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the probability of drawing at least one picture card when two cards are drawn from a standard deck without replacement. The correct probability is established as ##\frac{91}{221}##, derived from the formula for the union of two events, ##P(X \cup Y) = P(X) + P(Y) - P(X \cap Y)##. The participants clarify the interdependence of events X (first card is a picture card) and Y (second card is a picture card), emphasizing that the probabilities are not independent. The final computation confirms that the probability of at least one picture card is accurately represented by the complementary probability of drawing no picture cards.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic probability concepts, including conditional probability.
  • Familiarity with combinatorial mathematics, specifically combinations.
  • Knowledge of probability notation and terminology, such as union and intersection of events.
  • Ability to manipulate fractions and perform basic arithmetic operations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of conditional probability in depth, focusing on applications in card games.
  • Learn about combinatorial probability and how to calculate combinations using the binomial coefficient.
  • Explore the principles of independence in probability and how to identify dependent events.
  • Investigate other probability problems involving drawing cards from decks, such as calculating expected values.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of probability theory, mathematicians, and educators who are teaching concepts related to combinatorial probability and event interdependence. It is also useful for anyone interested in understanding the nuances of probability calculations in card games.

PhDeezNutz
Messages
851
Reaction score
561
Homework Statement
Two cards are drawn from a deck (without replacement), what is the probability that at least one card is a picture card
Relevant Equations
for non-mutually exclusive events
## P\left(X \cup Y \right) = P \left(X \right) + P \left( Y \right) - P\left( X \cap Y\right)##

for dependent events (the occurrence of one event effects the occurrence of another)

## P\left( X \cap Y\right) = P\left( X\right) P \left(Y \vert X\right)##

where ##P \left(Y \vert X\right)## means Probability of Y given X occurs
Let ##X## be the event that the first draw is a picture card
Let ##Y## by the event that the second is a picture card

Then the probability that at least one of the cards is a picture card is the probability of ##X## union ##Y## and has the formula

Equation 1
## P\left(X \cup Y \right) = P \left(X \right) + P \left( Y \right) - P\left( X \cap Y\right)##


I contend ##P \left(X\right) = \frac{12}{52}## and ##P \left( Y \right) = \frac{12}{51}## (because with one card gone there are now ##51## cards) left

however the probability of ##Y## definitely depends on ##X## and not the other way around. Given that ##P\left(X \cup Y \right) = P\left(Y \cup X \right)## Equation 1 becomes

Equation 2

## P\left(Y \cup X \right) = P \left(Y \right) + P \left( X \right) - P\left( Y \cap X\right)##

Given that ##P \left ( Y \cap X\right) = P \left(X \right) P \left( Y \vert X \right)##

Equation 2 becomes
Equation 3

## P\left(Y \cup X \right) = P \left(Y \right) + P \left( X \right) - P\left( Y \cap X\right) = P \left( Y \right) + P \left( X \right) - P\left(X \right) P\left(Y \vert X \right)##


##P\left(Y \vert X \right) = \frac{11}{51}## because if one picture card is gone that leaves ##11## picture cards out of a total of ##51## cards

Plugging in all the numbers

##\frac{12}{51} + \frac{12}{52} - \frac{12}{52} \left( \frac{11}{51}\right)##

## = \frac{93}{221}##

Apparently the correct answer is ##\frac{91}{221}##

where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are only 11 face cards out of 51 cards in the deck if the first card drawn was a face card. Thus P(Y) = \frac{12}{52}\frac{11}{51} + \frac{40}{52}\frac{12}{51} = \frac{12}{52}. You then have <br /> P(X) + P(Y) - P(X \cap Y) = \frac{12}{52} + \frac{12}{52} - \frac{11 \cdot 12}{52 \cdot 51} = \frac{1092}{2652} = \frac{7}{17} = \frac{91}{221}.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd, pinball1970, FactChecker and 1 other person
As the problem has been solved: A more direct computation:

Ways of drawing 2 out of 52 cards (unordered) = ##{52 \choose 2} = 52\cdot 51 / 2 = 1326##
Ways of drawing 2 non-face cards (unordered) = ##{40 \choose 2} = 40\cdot 39 / 2 = 780##
Probability of no face card = ##780/1326 = 10/17##
Probability of at least one face card = ##1 - 10/17 = 7/17 = 91/221##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and PhDeezNutz
pasmith said:
There are only 11 face cards out of 51 cards in the deck if the first card drawn was a face card. Thus P(Y) = \frac{12}{52}\frac{11}{51} + \frac{40}{52}\frac{12}{51} = \frac{12}{52}.
Also, just to point out the obvious: There is no need to split ##Y## into the two cases conditioned on ##X##. As ##P(Y)## is the probability of the second card being a face card, it should be clear that the (unconditioned) probability is 12/52 as 12 out of the 52 cards that may be second in the deck are face cards. The probability of any fixed card ending up at any particular fixed position is 1/52.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
Yet another route to the correct solution: when you see the words

PhDeezNutz said:
what is the probability that at least one

this should trigger the thought "this is 1 - the probability that none"

The probability of no picture card on the first draw is ## \frac{40}{52} ##
The probability of no picture card on the second draw is ## \frac{39}{51} ##
The probability of no picture card on either the first or second draw is ## \frac{40}{52} \frac{39}{51} = \frac{130}{221} ##
The probability of at least 1 picture card in the first 2 draws is ## 1 - \frac{130}{221} = \frac{91}{221} ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
The over arching impression I get is that in the formula

## P\left(X \cup Y \right) = P \left(X \right) + P \left( Y \right) - P\left( X \cap Y\right)##

is that ##P\left(X \right)## and ##P\left(Y \right)## are treated as independent events
and the interdependency is treated by the "cross term" (for lack of a better term) in ##P\left( X \cap Y\right) ##

is this a correct interpretation?
 
First of all, ##P(X)## and ##P(Y)## are probabilities, not events. The events are ##X## and ##Y## and they are certainly not independent. However, their distributions are the same, which does not mean that they are independent. Being independent would mean, e.g, that the distribution of ##Y## would be independent of the realised value of ##X##, which is not the case.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
4K