Two dimensional relative motion; boat and river problem

AI Thread Summary
Mary rows a 100-meter-wide river flowing east at 1.0 m/s, with her rowing speed at 2.0 m/s due north. When she rows directly north, she will land 300 meters downstream from her intended spot. Her speed relative to the shore is calculated using vector addition, leading to a discrepancy with the book's answer of 3.2 m/s. The discussion highlights potential errors in the book's solutions, suggesting that it may have addressed a different problem. This scenario illustrates the complexities of two-dimensional relative motion in physics.
physicsstdnt
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Mary needs to row her boat across a 100-m-wide river that is flowing to the east at a speed of 1.0 m/s. Mary can row with a speed of 2.0 m/s.
a) If Mary points her boat due north, how far from her intended landing spot will she be when she reaches the opposite shore?
b) What is her speed with respect to the shore?


Homework Equations


(V_r^2 + V_m^2)^(1/2)
In the y direction (north): d = 2t (where d is distance; t is time)
In the x direction (east): d = 1t


The Attempt at a Solution


a) I solved for t in the y direction and got 50 seconds then i plugged it into the x direction to find out how far off she was from her intended landing spot. The book shows a different answer than what i got.

b) I took the velocity of the river and squared it; then i took the velocity of Mary and squared it; then added and took the square root of the sum. I get 5^(1/2), but the book shows a different answer.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to physicsforums, physicsstdnt (appropriate name, btw). Um, your answers look fine to me (assuming that mary's rowing speed is independent of the speed of the river). What were the book's answers?
 
The book says that her speed was 3.2 m/s and she landed 300 meters away from her intended landing spot
 
The book's answer really doesn't make sense to me. It implies that relative to the shore, the boat is moving at roughly 3m/s east and 1m/s north, but since the river is only going at 1m/s east, this would imply she is trying to row downstream, which goes against the whole point of the problem.

It is possible that the book has printed the answer in the wrong place. (or just got the answer wrong). This does happen on occasion.
 
BruceW said:
The book's answer really doesn't make sense to me. It implies that relative to the shore, the boat is moving at roughly 3m/s east and 1m/s north
The book's answer makes perfect sense if the book solved a slightly different problem than the one stated in the question. The book's answer is for the problem where the river flows at 3 m/s and Mary rows at 1 m/s.

It is possible that the book has printed the answer in the wrong place. (or just got the answer wrong). This does happen on occasion.
It is also possible that the book's answer is for a question that differs from the question that was asked. This, too, happens on occasion.
 
Ok. I thought that it might be something like that, but i wanted to be sure. Thanks guys
 
no problem man. it is annoying when this kind of thing happens
 
two dimensional problem

Mary rows across a 100m wide river at 2m/s in the northen direction. River flows east at 1m/s. How far from her intended landing spot will she be when she reaches the opposite shore
Any help would be appreciated.[/QUOTE]
 
Any help would be appreciated.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
 
Back
Top