Two Infinite Non-Conducting Planes

  • Thread starter Thread starter blueskadoo42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Planes
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the surface charge density for an infinite non-conducting plane based on given electric field values in different regions. The subject area pertains to electrostatics and electric fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to combine electric field values but is uncertain about how to apply them correctly. Other participants express confusion about which fields to add or subtract and seek clarification on the relationships involved.

Discussion Status

Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between electric field and surface charge density, highlighting the need to consider the direction of the fields. Multiple interpretations of how to approach the problem are being explored, but there is no explicit consensus on the next steps.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's attempts indicate a potential misunderstanding of the relationships between electric fields and charge density, and there may be constraints related to the assumptions made about the planes and their fields.

blueskadoo42
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The electric field equals 19j for points above plane 'r', -31j between the planes, and -19j below plane 's', where j is the unit vector in the +y direction and the fields are in V/m. Calculate σr, the suface charge density for plane 'r'.

positive y- straight up
positive x-to the right.


Homework Equations



E=Qenc/Epsilon0

The Attempt at a Solution



i tried adding the 19j + -31j then multiplying that by Epsilon 0. that didnt work. not sure how to add or apply the electric fields. any pointers on how to solve that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump!
 
anyone? i don't know which field to add or subtract. any help?
 
You're using the wrong relationship between charge and E. While your relationship is strictly correct, what you need is

[tex]E=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}[/tex]

where [itex]E>0[/itex] means that it points away from the plane where [itex]\sigma[/itex] is (and [itex]\sigma>0[/itex]), and [itex]E<0[/itex] means that it points toward the plane where [itex]\sigma[/itex] is (and [itex]\sigma<0[/itex]). Then, you need to realize that the E in each of the three regions is the sum of the E's from the individual planes, and you have to be careful about the + and - signs. So, you can write 3 equations for the three regions in terms of the three E's and two [itex]\sigma[/itex]'s.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
5K