giokrutoi
- 128
- 1
no I have spring constant 20n/m.i forgot to mention it in early posts I said that k is givenharuspex said:not the spring constant, right?
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two objects attached by a spring on a frictionless surface. The original poster describes the scenario where one object is released, and the task is to find the maximum acceleration of the second object after the first reaches its equilibrium position.
The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on systematically approaching the problem. Some express confusion about the forces acting on the system and the implications for the center of mass, while others suggest focusing on relative velocities and the conservation of energy principles.
Participants note the absence of external forces acting on the system, which raises questions about the acceleration of the center of mass and the motion of the objects involved. There is also mention of the need for clearer definitions of variables and a complete problem statement to facilitate understanding.
no I have spring constant 20n/m.i forgot to mention it in early posts I said that k is givenharuspex said:not the spring constant, right?
That Vmax is valid in the ground frame of reference. After m2 is released, the whole system translates with the velocity of the center of mass, so both objects move with that velocity + the velocity of their vibration.giokrutoi said:hey I think I figured out everything
look
we can calculate maximal speed of m1 at the release point from conservation of energy all the potential energy is converted in kinetic of m1
then this v is maximal for m1 thing is that m1's coordinate dependence on time look's so
y=XmaxSINUS OMEGA t were we know omega
ehild said:That Vmax is valid in the ground frame of reference. After m2 is released, the whole system translates with the velocity of the center of mass, so both objects move with that velocity + the velocity of their vibration.
You turned to the center of mass frame of reference, where the blocks oscillate , but the maximum speed of oscillation is different from Vmax you got previously. You have to subtract the velocity of the center of mass.
If you got it, you can use that the maximum acceleration is maximum speed multiplied by omega. that you know already.
Just to check, the max acceleration I got for m2 is ##\frac{kx_1}{\sqrt{m_2(m_1+m_2)}}##giokrutoi said:yes that's exactly what I was saying
thanks a lot. For waisting your time on. Helping me
It depends what x1 means. It should be the initial compression, 0.1 m.haruspex said:Just to check, the max acceleration I got for m2 is ##\frac{kx_1}{\sqrt{m_2(m_1+m_2)}}##
ehild said:It depends what x1 means. It should be the initial compression, 0.1 m.
Yes, that looks to be what I did too. No need to get into the SHM details.ehild said:I outline the energy method suggested by jbriggs and me :
ΔL = 0.1 m is the initial compression of the spring.
V1 is the maximum speed of block1 after it was released, but block2 still fixed.
The total energy of the system is 1/2 m1V12=1/2 k (ΔL)2
##V_1 = \sqrt \frac {k}{m_1}\Delta L##
Speed of the CoM ##V_{CoM}= \frac {m_1V_1}{m_1+m_2}##
energy of translation ##E_{tr}=1/2 (m_1+m_2 ) \left( \frac {m_1V_1}{m_1+m_2} \right)^2##.
Let be S the maximum distortion of the spring after both blocks were released.
The spring energy is ##E_s =E-E_{tr}= 1/2 V_1^2 \frac {m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2}= 1/2 k S^2##
##S=V_1^2\sqrt {\frac {m_1m_2}{k(m_1+m_2)}}## and a2=KS/m2.