Two questions - factoring and exponents

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around two questions related to factoring a cubic polynomial and understanding properties of exponents. The original poster mentions a test question involving the factorization of the polynomial 2x^3-3x^2-16x-5 and its connection to finding a slant asymptote. The second question pertains to the evaluation of the expression 1.7^(-3/5) and its relation to exponent properties.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the factorization of the cubic polynomial, with some suggesting methods such as finding roots through substitution and polynomial division. Questions arise about the correctness of assumed factors and the nature of the roots. The discussion on exponents includes questioning the validity of a specific exponent property and clarifying the correct relationship between exponents.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions. Some guidance is offered regarding potential methods for factoring and evaluating expressions, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach to the polynomial or the exponent question.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the necessity of factoring the polynomial, as the original poster later indicates that the question may have been focused on finding a slant asymptote rather than factorization. Additionally, the original poster mentions that the final exam will not be multiple choice, adding pressure to understand the concepts thoroughly.

superdave
Messages
149
Reaction score
3
These aren't homework questions. They were on a test I had today.

The first was how do I factor 2x^3-3x^2-16x-5. I'm fairly certain that's right. It was actually part of a larger problem, involving finding a slant asymptote. I just used my graphing utility to find the answer, but I'd like to know how to actually factor that. I'm pretty sure you get (x+1) and a quadratic equation, just not sure what that equation is.

Second question is about exponents. I think I got this one wrong.

It was 1.7^(-3/5). Now, I got .787 I think. But what I was wondering, shouldn't the answer be equal to 1.7^-3 - 1.7^5? When I tested it, it wasn't. Isn't that one of the properties of exponents? x^(a/b) = x^a-x^b?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
superdave said:
shouldn't the answer be equal to 1.7^-3 - 1.7^5?

No, what it should be is [tex]\frac{x^a}{x^b} = x^{a-b}[/tex].

Also, I hate to break it to you, but I don't think that x+1 is a factor of that cubic (unless my mental maths is wrong - which is quite likely). To factor that, you might be able to find a root, by substituting numbers in and seeing if you get 0. Then, use polynomial division (assuming you can do that), to reduce the degree by 1, and then use the quadratic formula to get the other two roots.

You could always look at the co-efficients of the terms, e.g. the product of the three roots will equal 5/2, that might help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
err, I meant x-1.
 
superdave said:
err, I meant x-1.

Still doesn't work.

-Dan
 
Are you sure that that is what you need to factor? I ask this because this doesn't have nice roots. The roots are approximately -1.947985, -.3389005, and 3.7868854. So the factored form would look something like this:

f(x) = (x+1.948)(x+.3389)(x-3.787).
 
No. I could be remembering wrong. I didn't actually have to factor it. The question was about finding a slant asymptote. I assumed there was factoring. But it was too hard, so I just used my TI 84 to graph it, then found the asymptote through trial and error. (It was a multiple choice question. I just put in each option and looked to see if it worked with the other function.)

When we get our tests back Monday, I'll put the problem up. Cause I would like to know if there was an easy way. The final exam is not multiple choice, so it won't work for that.
 
Do you realize that there is no slant asymptote on that graph?

Are you sure it wasn't dealing with a different graph or something?
 
Maybe that was the numerator of a rational expression. In this case, you would divide it out and then the oblique asymptote is the line y = [the answer excluding the remainder].
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K