Two ways of detecting absolute motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter avito009
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Motion
Click For Summary
Absolute motion can be detected through two methods: measuring motion relative to light and observing inertial effects during acceleration. The Michelson-Morley experiment demonstrated that the first method is unworkable, leading to the conclusion that absolute motion is not detectable. Einstein's special theory of relativity supports this by asserting that the speed of light remains constant regardless of the observer's motion. This assumption aligns with experimental evidence and the established laws of electricity and magnetism. Ultimately, any alternative to this framework must also adhere to these principles to be considered valid.
avito009
Messages
184
Reaction score
4
There are two ways by which absolute motion might be detected: by measuring motion with respect to a beam of light, and by making use of inertial effects that arise when an object is accelerated. So why MichelsonMorley experiment showed the first method to be unworkable? Einstein's special theory of relativity explained why.

Correct me if I am wrong. Special relativity proved that no matter the position or speed with which a person is moving, the speed of light will be the same. Is this correct? otherwise how does SR prove that the first method is unworkable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Absolute motion relative to what? That's not a joke; all motion is relative.
 
Special relativity didn't prove that the speed of light is the same, it started with the assumption (Einstein's second postulate) that it was.

We choose to make this assumption because:
- It agrees with all the experimental evidence we have (including the Michelson-Morley experiment).
- It is consistent with the laws of electricity and magnetism, which were solidly established more than a half-century before the discovery of relativity.
- The conclusions that follow from that assumption can be tested, and when we test them they are confirmed.

That doesn't mean that it's right, but it does mean that any alternative that doesn't do all of the above has to be wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
avito009 said:
There are two ways by which absolute motion might be detected: by measuring motion with respect to a beam of light, and by making use of inertial effects that arise when an object is accelerated.
You can't use acceleration detect absolute motion because per Newton's first and second Laws of Motion, acceleration works the same regardless of your current state of motion.
 
avito009 said:
There are two ways by which absolute motion might be detected: by measuring motion with respect to a beam of light, and by making use of inertial effects that arise when an object is accelerated. So why MichelsonMorley experiment showed the first method to be unworkable? Einstein's special theory of relativity explained why.

Correct me if I am wrong. Special relativity proved that no matter the position or speed with which a person is moving, the speed of light will be the same. Is this correct? otherwise how does SR prove that the first method is unworkable?

Since the speed of light is the same in any reference frame measuring your speed using it as a reference will always produce: ta-da, the speed of light.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
985
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
7K