U233 immediate fission products ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anuj06
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fission
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 10K views
Anuj06
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, what are the immediate fission products of U233 ? Is the first fission reaction of U233 same as U235 producing Ba and Kr but just different isotopes than U235 ? I would appreciate any help.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anuj06 said:
Hi, what are the immediate fission products of U233 ? Is the first fission reaction of U233 same as U235 producing Ba and Kr but just different isotopes than U235 ? I would appreciate any help.

Thanks
The fission product elements are much the same, however, one starts with 2 fewer neutrons.

U-235 + n => U-236* => f.p. + 2 or 3 n

U-233 + n => U-234* => f.p. + 2 or 3 n

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v161/n4092/pdf/161520a0.pdf

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2546513&postcount=9
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you ! But, then a small question, is U233 chain reaction self sustainable since it release fewer neutrons ?
 
One would be interested in

η = reproduction factor = number of neutrons produced per neutron absorbed in fuel
> 2 implies breeding is possible

ν (nu) = number of neutrons produced per fission


Code:
Isotope  Thermal η   Fast η
  U-235      2.07        2.30
  Pu-239     2.11        2.70
  U-233      2.30        2.45
Ref: http://www.if.uidaho.edu/~gunner/ME443-543/LectureNotes/LMFBR.pdf

http://energyfromthorium.com/2006/07/29/wash-1097-appendix-a-reactor-physics/
It's probably better to obtain a copy of WASH-1097.

One can also construct a tighter (hex or triangular) lattice similar to that of a VVER-1000. Or one could use a CANDU (deuterium moderated) system, or a graphite moderated system using SiC/C clad fuel. Flouride salt is another possibility.

And one can minimize the parastic absorption of neutrons by exclusing Ni-based alloys from the reactor internals, to the extent possible.

This might be of interest.
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/4505731-QrJfWh/4505731.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator: