Calculating Uncertainty: Where Am I Going Wrong?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of uncertainty in a physics problem, specifically addressing the propagation of uncertainty in the equation for frequency (f). The user initially misapplied the uncertainty equation, leading to confusion with an additional 'b' term. Key corrections include understanding that Δf/f = ΔP/P = 0.05 and clarifying that the factor of 2 in the equation was incorrectly introduced. The correct interpretation of uncertainty and its application in the context of the problem is essential for arriving at a numerical value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of uncertainty propagation in measurements
  • Familiarity with basic physics equations, particularly those involving frequency
  • Knowledge of LaTeX for formatting equations
  • Concept of relative uncertainty and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of uncertainty propagation in physics
  • Learn how to correctly apply the uncertainty equation in various contexts
  • Review examples of frequency calculations involving uncertainty
  • Explore LaTeX formatting for presenting mathematical equations accurately
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, researchers dealing with experimental data, and anyone involved in calculations requiring uncertainty analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
A histological slide contains darkly stained cells of two kinds-normal cells which are circular in shape and elliptical cells f the same area (which are pathological). An automated image processing sequence aims to identify and distinguish the individual objects and calculating their respective form factors.

The are of an ellipse is ##A=\pi ab##( where a is the length of the semi-major axis, and b is the length of the semi-minor axis). The perimeter of an ellipse is quite difficult to calculate but a simply and fairly crude approximation is given by

$$P=2\pi \sqrt{\frac{a^2+b^2}{2}}$$

d) using the formulae above, calculate #f# for an ellipse and deduce its maximum and minimum values as ##a## ranges from ##b## to ##3b##. Sketch ##f## as ##a## ranges from ##b## to ##3b##

e)We assume that the perimeter of the ellipse given by the formula above is uncertain to about 5% of it true value bu the area is know exactly.
Derive the corresponding uncertainty in ##f##, and use your sketch from part d) (or otherwise) to deduce the minimum value of the ratio of ##a## to ##b## which would enable a clear distinction to be made between normal and pathological cells?
Relevant Equations
Uncertainty equation
$$Y=X^n$$
$$\Delta Y = |n|\frac{\Delta x}{x}|Y|$$

form factor equation
$$f=\frac{\pi ab}{\left(2\pi \sqrt{\frac{a^2+b^2}{2}}\right)^2}$$
So the only part of this question I am having an issue with is the uncertainty part in part e). I have included the whole question as reference. So to derive the uncertainty in ff I used the uncertainty equation outlined above but the issue is that when I propagate the uncertainty I end up with an additional b term which I believe should cancel and I should end up with a numerical value, believe not 100% certain.

My working are as follows

$$\frac{\Delta f}{f}=2 \frac{\Delta P}{P}$$$$\frac{\Delta f}{f}=2 \frac{0.05}{2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{a^2+b^2}{2}}} $$

Now if i use the value give say a=b then if I sub that into my uncertainty equation I will be left with a b term, which is seems to confuse me as surely I would need a numerical value, as to me the question is asking for a numerical value, by asking for the uncertainty in f?

Now I am a bit ropy with uncertainty equations, but after a brief look at some examples, I can't see the equation I am using to be wrong, could anyone maybe advise me if I am going wrong as to why.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to be applying your uncertainty equation wrongly. If f = A/P, then n = -1 and
Δf = 1*(ΔP/P)*f
Δf/f = ΔP/P = 0.05
Your mistakes appear to be
(i) Where does the number 2 come from?
(ii) You are repeating f (or ff as you call it) - it should either be in the numerator of the RHS, or the denominator of the LHS, but not both.
(iii) 0.05 is ΔP/P, not ΔP, so don't divide by P.
 
Okay sorry i need to edit the OP the 2 comes from the nurmerator being square which I used a latex generator, I pasted the equation in incorrectly, my appoliges I will correct the.
 
OK, you've corrected that, but you still wrongly have the expression for P in the denominator. 0.05 is ΔP/P, not ΔP. Do you understand what "5% uncertainty" means?
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K