Uncertainty Help: Working Out Approx % Error in Specific Heat Capacity

  • Thread starter Thread starter spoony33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainties
Click For Summary
To calculate the approximate percentage error in specific heat capacity, the total uncertainty must be determined first. The formula for uncertainty propagation states that for products, the relative error is the sum of the relative errors of the individual measurements. The relevant equation for heat transfer, Q=mcΔT, involves mass, specific heat capacity, and temperature change, where each component contributes to the overall uncertainty. To reduce the percentage error in specific heat capacity, one suggested method is to improve measurement accuracy, such as using more precise instruments. Understanding and applying these uncertainty propagation principles is essential for accurate calculations in thermodynamics.
spoony33
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have this question for homework and I'm well stuck!


The specific heat capacity of a liquid was found by heating a measures quantity of the liquid for a certain length of time. The following results were obtained.
Power of heater: ( 50.0 ± 0.5)W
Mass of liquid: (200 ± 10)g
Time of heating: (600 ± 1)s
Temperature rise: (50.0 ± 0.5)°C

I managed to get the percentage error in each reading but i just don't know how to work out the approximate percentage error in the value of specific heat capacity!

A) What will the approximate percentage error in the value of specific heat capacity?
B) Suggest one way in which to reduce the percentage error obtained for the specific heat capacity?


I managed to work out this but i don't know how to work out the approximate percentage error in the value of specific heat capacity?
The percentage of uncertainty of each is:
Power of heater:
(±0.5)/50.0 = ± 1%

Mass of liquid
(±10)/200 = ± 5%

Time of heating:
(±1)/600 = ±0.167 %

Temperature Rise:
(±.5)/50.0 = ± 1%

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nah, you have to get the total uncertainty first.

So Q=mcT

I don't remember how the uncertainties propagate for products, but it's something you can look up, or if you know partial derivatives you can use the "master formula."
 
For products, the relative error on the measured quantity is equal to the sum of the relative errors. So if

z=x\cdot y

then

\frac{\Delta z}{z}=\frac{\Delta x}{x}+\frac{\Delta y}{y}

A more general approach is the formula for uncertainty on a measured quatity f(x,y). The absolute error in f is given by

\Delta f=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \Delta x+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \Delta y

and the standard deviation is given by

\sigma _f=\sqrt{(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \Delta x)^2+(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \Delta y)^2}

If you plug f(x,y)=x \cdot y into the formula for absolute uncertainty and rearrange a little, you'll notice that it reduces to the first formule for absolute error for products.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K