Uncertainty in resistance measurements with multimeter

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the uncertainties in resistance measurements using different multimeters, specifically analyzing the specifications of two models. The first multimeter has an uncertainty of "0.7% + 1D," while the second features "0.05% + 2D + 0.02 ohms." The interpretation of "2D" is clarified as referring to the last two significant digits of the measurement. The goal is to establish a common value across measurements with their respective uncertainties, which requires precise calculations based on the stated specifications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multimeter specifications and uncertainty calculations
  • Familiarity with significant figures and their impact on measurement accuracy
  • Basic knowledge of resistance measurement techniques
  • Experience with interpreting manufacturer documentation for digital multimeters
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Fluke multimeter specifications and uncertainty guidelines
  • Learn about advanced uncertainty analysis techniques in measurement
  • Explore the impact of significant digits on measurement precision
  • Investigate different types of multimeters and their accuracy ratings
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, laboratory technicians, and anyone involved in precision measurement and calibration of electronic components will benefit from this discussion.

Tom Pietress
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am writing a report on an experiment involving measuring the resistance of one component with different multimeters, and finding the uncertainties of these measurements from the multimeters themselves. For example, with one of the multimeters I got 270.1 ohms. This multimeter have stated "0.7% + 1D" which means the uncertainty is +/- http://www.vissarion.biz/div/untitled.JPG ,[/URL] the square root of 0.7% of the measured value squared plus the last significant digit squared.

However, one of the multimeters have specified "0.05% + 2D + 0.02 ohms".
I assume that 0.02 squared should be added to the equation, but what does 2D mean? Is it the last significant digit times two, or the last two significant digits? I assumed the latter, using 0.1 squared (since there are two significant decimals in the measured value), however this gives an uncertainty so very much smaller than the others. One of the goals is to establish a value that exists in all of the measured values +/- uncertainty, however the value I get here does not overlap the other values.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
for 0.7% + 1D, I think you need to multiply the actual resistance by +/-0.7%, and then add/subtract a single digit increment in the least significant displayed digit.

for 0.05% + 2D + 0.02 Ohms, you multiply the actual resistance by +/-0.05%, add 0.02 Ohms, and add/subtract two increments of the least significant displayed digit.

I'm no expert on this, but that's how I would interpret it. Is there any more information at the DVM manufacturer's websites? Like check out Fluke's website, for example.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K