Calculating Electron Energy with Uncertainty Principle: Homework Example

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum energy of an electron confined to a spherical region of radius 0.1 nm using the uncertainty principle. The initial calculation yielded 2.86 eV, but the expected answer is approximately 10 eV. Key equations include the uncertainty relation (delta-x * delta-p = h-bar / lambda) and the energy formula (Energy = 0.5 * p^2 / m). The participants highlight the need to correctly account for the uncertainty in position and momentum, suggesting that the initial approach may have overlooked critical factors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of electron properties (mass, charge)
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in detail
  • Study the derivation of energy levels in quantum confinement
  • Learn about the implications of spherical confinement on electron behavior
  • Explore statistical methods for deriving uncertainty principles
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and the behavior of electrons in confined systems.

v_pino
Messages
156
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using the uncertainty principle, estimate the minimum energy in electron volts of an electron confined to a spherical region of radius 0.1nm.

Homework Equations



delta-x * delta-p = h-bar / lamda

delta-y * delta-p = h-bar / lamda

delta-z * delta-p = h-bar / lamda

Energy = 0.5* p^2 / m

p = momentum
m = mass of electron

The Attempt at a Solution



By letting the uncertainty in position (delta-x, delta-y, delta-z) equal to r, I got 2.86eV :

Total energy = 3/8 * (h-bar^2 / r^2 * m)

But the answer should be ~ 10ev.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[STRIKE]If the electron is confined in a spherical region, the uncertainty in X is given by \Delta X = X_{2} - X_{1}

So taking the centre of the sphere as 0, you will have 0.1nm and -0.1nm as X_{2} and X_{1} respectively, \DeltaX will then be 0.2nm

Hope this helps ;)[/STRIKE]

Mulling it over a coffee. Brb.
 
Last edited:
This will make matters worse by a factor of 4. Also on the right hand side of the uncertainty inequality there should be a 1/2, which would give an additional factor of 4 in the wrong direction. Are you sure the given answer is correct.
 
Sure, no. I'll consider over a coffee.
 
One can derive the general uncertainity principle by using the standard deviation method of statistics.
Here delta(x) and delta(p) are standard deviations.
(delta(x))^(2)=|<x^(2)>-<x>^(2)|
(delta(p))^(2)=|<p^(2)>-<p>^(2)|
 
Deric Boyle said:
One can derive the general uncertainity principle by using the standard deviation method of statistics.
Here delta(x) and delta(p) are standard deviations.
(delta(x))^(2)=|<x^(2)>-<x>^(2)|
(delta(p))^(2)=|<p^(2)>-<p>^(2)|

So how does this help solving the problem at hand?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K