Uncovering the History of SHM: From Newton to Trig Functions

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Crosson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    History Shm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the historical development of the mathematical study of simple harmonic motion (SHM), specifically the differential equation \(\frac{d^2X(t)}{dt^2} +\frac{k}{m} X(t) = 0\). Participants speculate on the origins of this equation, attributing it to figures such as the Bernoullis or Euler, while dismissing Hooke and Newton as primary contributors. The conversation highlights the significance of trigonometric functions in calculus and their connection to Newton's mechanics, suggesting that early mathematicians may have found the equation's implications profoundly satisfying.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • Familiarity with simple harmonic motion concepts
  • Knowledge of Newtonian mechanics
  • Basic grasp of trigonometric functions and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the contributions of the Bernoulli family to mathematics
  • Study Euler's work on differential equations
  • Explore the historical context of Hooke's law and its implications in physics
  • Learn about the applications of trigonometric functions in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, historians of science, and anyone interested in the evolution of mathematical concepts related to simple harmonic motion.

Crosson
Messages
1,256
Reaction score
4
I am wondering if anyone knows the history of the mathematical study of simple harmonic motion. Who first set up the equation:

\frac{d^2X(t)}{dt^2} +\frac{k}{m} X(t) = 0

Was it Newton? Hooke? Did they know about uniqueness of solutions?

The trig functions occupy such a cetral role these days in the study of calculus, this differential equation has a magic trick feeling to it. If the discoverer's of this equation viewed it in a similar context as ourselves, it must have been one of the most instantly satisfying confirmations of Newton's Mechanics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting question!
You can certainly disregard Hooke, and also, I think, Newton&Leibniz.
If I were to make a bet, I'd say one of the Bernoullis or Euler.

However, since Hooke's law was known to Newton, it might well be that Newton was aware of this. If he ever published anything to that effect, is another matter.

(However, I'm not speaking from knowledge here; just speculating..)
 
Last edited:
Atwood, I think
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
4K