Understanding Action & Reaction Forces

AI Thread Summary
Action and reaction forces are illustrated by how rockets operate, where the rocket pushes fuel out, and the fuel exerts an equal and opposite force back on the rocket. The high-pressure gases expelled at high speed from the rocket's combustion chamber create thrust, enabling the rocket to rise. Initially, the process is inefficient due to the significant force with minimal altitude gain, but efficiency improves as speed increases. It's noted that rockets do not require ground support to function, as the gases can push against the vacuum of space. Historical misconceptions about rocket propulsion in space were corrected after significant advancements in space travel.
accelerate23
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am kind of confused about this. What is the action and equal and opposite reaction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The rocket imparts a force on the fuel by ejecting it , the ejected fuel exerts an equal, but oppositely directed force on the rocket.
 


Thanks!
 


It's all those exhaust gases emerging from the nozzles at super high speed that the rocket engines are emitting. At the back of the combustion chambers there is a high pressure that pushes up against the inside, raising the rocket, whilst the same pressure is pushing the gases out at the bottom. The momentum of all that high speed gas is equal to the momentum gained by the rocket.
At the start of the flight, the whole process is INCREDIBLY inefficient because there's a lot of force but not much distance raised. It gets better as the rocket starts to go faster.

PS you don't need the ground to be there for the gases to 'push against'. However, it's got to be true that, (as with a hovercraft) whilst on the ground, there will be a bit of excess pressure under the rocket, which will help to lift it the first meter or so. Above that, the gases can escape so easily that the pressure is not helped by the presence of the ground.
 


Thank you so much!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top