Understanding Angular Momentum in Gravitational Systems

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to gravitational systems, specifically focusing on gravitational potential energy, conservation of energy, and centripetal force, despite being titled as an angular momentum problem.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the gravitational potential difference and its implications for energy conservation. Some express confusion regarding the application of gravitational potential energy formulas, particularly in relation to the height being significant compared to the radius of the asteroid.

Discussion Status

There are multiple lines of reasoning being explored, with participants questioning the appropriateness of using certain formulas for gravitational potential energy. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculation of gravitational potential and the need to consider the height in relation to the radius of the asteroid.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem's context may not align with typical assumptions about gravitational potential energy due to the significant height involved compared to the radius of the asteroid.

Kitten207
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is stated here:

http://i53.tinypic.com/2wfl4jm.jpg


Please take a look.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kitten207 said:

Homework Statement



The problem is stated here:

http://i53.tinypic.com/2wfl4jm.jpg


Please take a look.
What do you think?

Just to get you started, The problem doesn't have much to do with angular momentum in particular. The title of the thread is "Angular Momentum Problem," but the problem more about gravitation, conservation of energy, and centripetal force.

Here are some starting hints:
  • Part a): What is the gravitational potential difference between something on the surface of the asteroid (radius 4500 m) and something 400 meters above the surface?
  • Part b): Use conservation of energy (for potential energy simply use mgh for situations here on Earth near the surface).
  • Part c): What is the centripetal force on the spaceship (the force keeping it in orbit)? [There are two ways to formulate this force -- set them equal to each other. :wink:]
 
I don't think I understand your first point, but this is what I got for it:

U_i = K_f
mgh = ½mv²
v= √2gh

What value do I use for g?

Thank you for the other two hints!
 
oh I'm a bit confused on the second part too actually. So:

U_i = K_f
mgh = ½mv²
v= √2gh
= √(2)(9.8m/s²)(400m)
=7840 m
I can't jump that fast...right? Is this correct?
 
Kitten207 said:
I don't think I understand your first point, but this is what I got for it:

U_i = K_f
mgh = ½mv²
v= √2gh

What value do I use for g?
The gravitational P.E. = mgh is an approximation, and only applies if the height h is very, very small compared to the radius of the planet/asteroid. But that doesn't work so well here since you're jumping distance that is almost 1/10 of the entire radius of the planet. 1/10 is a significant portion of the radius, so I wouldn't use mgh for this part.

The more precise gravitational potential energy of spherical planet/asteroid can be found using the potential difference.

The gravitational potential of a spherical planet/asteroid can be found using
Potential = GM/r,​
where,
G = gravitational constant
M = mass of planet or asteriod
r = distance to the center of the planet/asteroid.
It is assumed that the potential is with respect a distance of infinity.

Calculate the gravitational potential at the asteroid's surface (one radius from its center). Then calculate the gravitational potential at a distance of Radius + 400 m from the asteroid's center. The difference between these two potentials is called the potential difference.

The difference in potential energy of an object of mass m between these two heights is the potential difference multiplied by m.
Kitten207 said:
oh I'm a bit confused on the second part too actually. So:

U_i = K_f
mgh = ½mv²
v= √2gh
= √(2)(9.8m/s²)(400m)
=7840 m
I can't jump that fast...right? Is this correct?
You need to calculate v by solving part a) of the problem. By the time you get to part b) you should already know v.

Then once you get to part b), you need to solve for h, not v.

(But your choice of using mgh = ½mv² is good here :approve:. The height that you can jump here on Earth is minuscule compared to the radius of the Earth. So mgh = ½mv² is okay to use.)
 
thank you so much!
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K