Kitten207
- 10
- 0
Homework Statement
The problem is stated here:
http://i53.tinypic.com/2wfl4jm.jpg
Please take a look.
Last edited by a moderator:
The discussion revolves around a problem related to gravitational systems, specifically focusing on gravitational potential energy, conservation of energy, and centripetal force, despite being titled as an angular momentum problem.
There are multiple lines of reasoning being explored, with participants questioning the appropriateness of using certain formulas for gravitational potential energy. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculation of gravitational potential and the need to consider the height in relation to the radius of the asteroid.
Participants note that the problem's context may not align with typical assumptions about gravitational potential energy due to the significant height involved compared to the radius of the asteroid.
What do you think?Kitten207 said:Homework Statement
The problem is stated here:
http://i53.tinypic.com/2wfl4jm.jpg
Please take a look.
The gravitational P.E. = mgh is an approximation, and only applies if the height h is very, very small compared to the radius of the planet/asteroid. But that doesn't work so well here since you're jumping distance that is almost 1/10 of the entire radius of the planet. 1/10 is a significant portion of the radius, so I wouldn't use mgh for this part.Kitten207 said:I don't think I understand your first point, but this is what I got for it:
U_i = K_f
mgh = ½mv²
v= √2gh
What value do I use for g?
You need to calculate v by solving part a) of the problem. By the time you get to part b) you should already know v.Kitten207 said:oh I'm a bit confused on the second part too actually. So:
U_i = K_f
mgh = ½mv²
v= √2gh
= √(2)(9.8m/s²)(400m)
=7840 m
I can't jump that fast...right? Is this correct?
. The height that you can jump here on Earth is minuscule compared to the radius of the Earth. So mgh = ½mv² is okay to use.)