Understanding Arcsin and L'Hopital: Finding the Limit of (arcsin(2x))/x^3

  • Thread starter Thread starter idris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    l'hopital
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the limit of the function (arcsin(2x))/x^3 as x approaches 0 using L'Hopital's Rule. The user initially struggles with the validity of applying L'Hopital's Rule due to the limit of arcsin(2x) approaching 2x instead of 0 or infinity. Ultimately, the user realizes that the limit as x approaches 0 is indeed a number, confirming the continuity of the function and the correct application of L'Hopital's Rule.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of L'Hopital's Rule
  • Knowledge of the arcsin function and its properties
  • Familiarity with limits in calculus
  • Basic trigonometric identities and approximations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of L'Hopital's Rule in various limit problems
  • Explore the properties of the arcsin function and its Taylor series expansion
  • Learn about continuity and differentiability in calculus
  • Investigate the behavior of trigonometric functions near zero
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians interested in limit evaluation, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of L'Hopital's Rule and trigonometric limits.

idris
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, have a questions about L'Hopital and arcsin.

The question is to find the limit of (arcsin(2x))/x^3 as x->0. I can find the limit no problem just by applying L'Hopital, but I am having difficulty proving that it's valid to use L'Hopital with the function, because with f(x)=arcsin(2x), the limit of arcsin(2x) as x->0 is 2x, rather than 0 or infinity as is required. I think I may have to express arcsin(2x) as a ratio and then apply L'Hopital again, but I can't figure out how to do that. Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
that is strange, I thought lim (y ->0) arcsin(y) = 0
 
I thought that for very small values of sin or arcsin, sin(x) roughly = x? So that if you take the limit as x->0, it will never be 0, but just the input? This is hard to explain - the function doesn't "get closer" to anything as it approaches 0, it just oscillates around the value inputted - so it can't really be said to have a limit as x->0?

Or is that all totally off-base?

EDIT: Yeah, it is. I just needed to read over my trig notes a bit closer. Thanks malawi for putting me back on track...!
 
Last edited:
idris said:
I thought that for very small values of sin or arcsin, sin(x) roughly = x? So that if you take the limit as x->0, it will never be 0, but just the input? This is hard to explain - the function doesn't "get closer" to anything as it approaches 0, it just oscillates around the value inputted - so it can't really be said to have a limit as x->0?

Or is that all totally off-base?

EDIT: Yeah, it is. I just needed to read over my trig notes a bit closer. Thanks malawi for putting me back on track...!

No, the limit, as x--> 0 is NUMBER. In general, if f(x) is a continuous function,
\lim_{x\rightarrowa}f(g(x))= f(\lim_{x\rightarrowa}g(x)).
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K