Understanding Automotive Differentials: How Do They Work?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of automotive differentials, specifically focusing on open and limited slip differentials (LSD). Participants explore how torque and power are distributed to the wheels during cornering, the implications of different differential designs, and the terminology used to describe these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that in standard open differentials, torque is equal on both wheels while power differs due to the varying distances traveled during a turn.
  • Others agree that the torque remains the same in open differentials and note that power delivery changes based on wheel speed and distance traveled.
  • There is a discussion about limited slip differentials, where torque can vary under slippery conditions, but some participants clarify that this is not a torque biasing system but rather a wheel speed control mechanism.
  • Some participants express concern over the terminology used, particularly the distinction between power and torque in the context of differentials, suggesting that both terms can describe differential behavior but may lead to confusion.
  • One participant mentions that LSD can promote understeer in rear-wheel-drive vehicles, which can have varying implications depending on the vehicle's handling characteristics.
  • There is a debate about whether controlling torque is equivalent to controlling wheel speed, with some arguing that controlling wheel speed is simpler and more common in practice.
  • Participants discuss the conditions under which wheel speeds should be the same in an LSD, noting that ideally this occurs only in straight-line travel.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on some foundational aspects of how open and limited slip differentials operate, but there are multiple competing views regarding the terminology and the mechanics of torque versus wheel speed control. The discussion remains unresolved on several technical points and definitions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the implications of torque biasing terminology and its relation to wheel speed control. There are also discussions about the conditions under which differentials operate optimally, which may depend on traction and vehicle dynamics.

  • #31
Torque is the same while speed of each wheel is different.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
slideways said:
If I understand the question correctly, you are OK with the idea that the left and right axle torque is the same. But I think you are confusing something I have said. I think the confusion is the statement that the sum of the left and right torque is that of the crown gear. So if the engine applies 100 N-m to the crown then the left + right shaft torque = 100 N-m. This doesn't mean that each wheel sees 100 N-m.

Think of a seesaw. Put a 30kg kid on each end. The pivot has to support 60kg. The crown gear has to apply enough torque for both wheels. If that torque split is even then the torque to each wheel is 1/2 that of the crown gear.

See attached my sketch. I have difficulty understanding how the torque is split 50:50 in the case of straight line driving in which the crownwheel/diff housing and diff gears are all rotating as one, ie just one rigid bar...
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0160.jpg
    IMAG0160.jpg
    15.4 KB · Views: 555
  • #33
Go the other way then; let's put the car in the air on a hoist and a guy at each wheel with a lever attached to the wheel. Pretend it's not a diff but is forced to act as a solid bar and the driveshaft is locked (automatic in park).

How much torque is there at the carrier if one guy is applying 40 N-m on one wheel? Now have the other guy exert 60 N-m in the same direction on the other wheel; how much torque is acting on the carrier now? Is it any different than if both guys were at the same wheel and still applying the same amount as before? The forces are balanced, so it's always 100 at the carrier because that's the total of the forces being applied.

If a mechanism allows the forces to be applied equally to two (or more) "resistances", the force applied at each is the original force divided by the number of resistances. That's why a four wheel drive doesn't accelerate any faster in four wheel drive than it does in two wheel drive; the power input is the same but the torque at each of the wheels in four wheel drive is half as much as at the rear wheels in two wheel drive. That's also what keeps the tires from spinning in four wheel drive when they would spin in two wheel drive.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
bugatti79, I don't think you can assume that the axle shaft is solid from one side to the other in the case of straight line driving. The appearance is the same but it is not the case.
-
I would say it is similar to hooking a chain from one corner of the front of the vehicle to the other corner of the front in a fashion that allows the chain to loop out ahead of the vehicle about 20 feet. Pull on it while allowing the loop to slide back and forth on whatever you are pulling it with and you can guarantee the force on the chain will be split in half. Anchor the loop chain to whatever is pulling it so it cannot slide and you no longer have that guarantee.
 
  • #35
bugatti79 said:
See attached my sketch. I have difficulty understanding how the torque is split 50:50 in the case of straight line driving in which the crownwheel/diff housing and diff gears are all rotating as one, ie just one rigid bar...

They aren't really rotating as one. Think of it as balanced. A seesaw with two 30kg kids is balanced but that doesn't mean the thing can't pivot. The only way it stays balanced is if the load on each side is equal.

Take a look at the video Tea Jay posted. Notice the part where he attached a single spoke to each wheel (3:45) and where he pushes each with a bar (4:20). What he is illustrating with the bar that can't pivot is a welded seesaw. He shows how holding one wheel will stop the bar. I think that should be easy to see. Because the bar is locked in the center, you can't spin it and both wheels turn at the same speed. This is the welded axle case.

At 4:51 he puts the bar on a pivot. Now it's like the seesaw. If the bar is going to not rotate the loads on either end must be equal. So if the load the bar applies to each side is equal then the torque to each wheel must be equal. Does that clear up the straight line case?

Now when we corner the bar (gear) does spin but it does so at a constant speed. Well let's think of angular acceleration. If the gear spins at a constant speed that means all the forces are balanced. The gear teeth on the left side have to push with equal but opposite force with respect to the right or the gear will not just spin but accelerate. So if it's not accelerating, then the forces must be equal thus the torques are equal. This second explanation is perhaps a bit to brief but I think if you understand the first one it's easier to see this one.
 
  • #36
I think I am satisfied now where the 50:50 split is coming from for an open diff. I was making a big job out it more than I should have. See attached my interpretation with a FBD.

(I forgot to write that M_1=F_1y*r and M_2=F_2y*r but it doesn't change anything.

Everything Slideways says on LSD makes perfect sense. :-)
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0161.jpg
    IMAG0161.jpg
    16.3 KB · Views: 498
Last edited:
  • #37
I think you are close to getting it but perhaps not quite.
In the picture the red arrow is the force the crown gear and diff housing applies to the spider gear. The two green arrows are the forces applied to the spider gear by the two axle drive gears (the bevel gears). The orange arrow represents rotation of the spider gear about it's own axis.

Since the spider gear can turn we can see that the two green forces must be equal or the spider will start turning. If it turns the two wheels must spin at different speeds. If we are going straight and not spinning the tires we know that the two outputs are spinning at the same speed thus the green arrows are the same and thus the force applied to the spider gear = 2x the force applied to one axle. Add some radius values and now we have torques.

So what about the case when we are turning? Well the 50:50 still holds true EXCEPT for the case when we are changing our yaw rate.

Looking at the spider gear we can see that it's rotation is going to be controlled by something like τ=J dω/dt. (sum of torques = inertia* angular acceleration). The left and right green arrows of course create the torques on the spider gear. If we are making a steady right turn the left wheel will spin faster than the right but the speeds will remain constant. So let's say we are making a steady right hand turn thus the left axle is spinning at 30 RPM while the right spins at 27. You can see the spider gear will spin in this case. Making some assumptions about the size and directions of the gears I'm going to say the spider spins at 3 RPM clockwise as seen in my picture. So in that case what is the sum of the torques? Look at τ=J dω/dt. J, well it's something bigger than zero. dω/dt, well it's 0 because the rotational speed of the spider gear is constant. That means τ must sum to 0 thus the left and right green arrows must be equal.

Where this actually breaks down is when you change your rate of turn. At that point because you have a change in ω you must have a net τ. However I think if we had real numbers we would find the numbers are small enough to not mater.

Hope that further clarifies.
 

Attachments

  • diff.jpg
    diff.jpg
    8.7 KB · Views: 476
  • #38
slideways said:
I think you are close to getting it but perhaps not quite.
In the picture the red arrow is the force the crown gear and diff housing applies to the spider gear. The two green arrows are the forces applied to the spider gear by the two axle drive gears (the bevel gears). The orange arrow represents rotation of the spider gear about it's own axis.

Since the spider gear can turn we can see that the two green forces must be equal or the spider will start turning. If it turns the two wheels must spin at different speeds. If we are going straight and not spinning the tires we know that the two outputs are spinning at the same speed thus the green arrows are the same and thus the force applied to the spider gear = 2x the force applied to one axle. Add some radius values and now we have torques.

So what about the case when we are turning? Well the 50:50 still holds true EXCEPT for the case when we are changing our yaw rate.

Looking at the spider gear we can see that it's rotation is going to be controlled by something like τ=J dω/dt. (sum of torques = inertia* angular acceleration). The left and right green arrows of course create the torques on the spider gear. If we are making a steady right turn the left wheel will spin faster than the right but the speeds will remain constant. So let's say we are making a steady right hand turn thus the left axle is spinning at 30 RPM while the right spins at 27. You can see the spider gear will spin in this case. Making some assumptions about the size and directions of the gears I'm going to say the spider spins at 3 RPM clockwise as seen in my picture. So in that case what is the sum of the torques? Look at τ=J dω/dt. J, well it's something bigger than zero. dω/dt, well it's 0 because the rotational speed of the spider gear is constant. That means τ must sum to 0 thus the left and right green arrows must be equal.

Where this actually breaks down is when you change your rate of turn. At that point because you have a change in ω you must have a net τ. However I think if we had real numbers we would find the numbers are small enough to not mater.

Hope that further clarifies.

Very good, I like that. Although I am curious where you think I don't get it? From my diagram I have Tx coming from the crown wheel which translates into the red arrow force you have, ie from the housing onto the spider..

I believe things make perfect sense to me now.
 
  • #39
bugatti79 said:
Very good, I like that. Although I am curious where you think I don't get it? From my diagram I have Tx coming from the crown wheel which translates into the red arrow force you have, ie from the housing onto the spider..

I believe things make perfect sense to me now.

I couldn't follow your written description (it wasn't that easy to read the photo) and I wasn't sure if we were saying the same thing. Either way, if what I just posted is in line with what you were thinking all is clear.
 
  • #40
I found this very cool demo explaining differential gears. I post it here for future reference:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4JhruinbWc

Click here to jump directly to the explanation.
 
  • #41
A.T. said:
I found this very cool demo explaining differential gears. I post it here for future reference:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4JhruinbWc

Click here to jump directly to the explanation.



Did you find it on page 1 of this thread, where I posted it?

:D



It is a great video though.

:D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K