Understanding Ball Deformation in Collisions: A Microscopic vs. Macroscopic View

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the deformation of balls during collisions, highlighting the importance of material properties in determining the outcome, such as whether a ball experiences damage or permanent deformation. The user seeks resources for understanding these concepts, particularly through microscopic and macroscopic perspectives, while acknowledging the complexity of the mathematics involved. They specifically mention tennis balls, noting that they typically do not undergo significant permanent deformation upon impact. A suggestion is made to explore research from a professor at the University of Illinois, who has written about the physics of baseball, including ball deformation. The conversation emphasizes the elastic properties of hollow balls, which allow them to return to their original shape after deformation.
niscsi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

Firstly I'm begginer level at physics, but I'm thinking for days about this problem:
how change tha ball shape when it collide with a wall.
I'm looking for books etc on the net, i found several about deformation but all i found
are very short. The best is write about usually the compute the deformation are two way
microscopic and the simpler is a macroscope/fenomelogy view. This book mentioned whan i
would like to calculate the deformation of shape i have to calculate some motion differential
equations but this is very complicated. So I'm looking for books which include more about this..
(Sorry i read this book in hungarian so maybe my translate is not correct so I'm looking for the
correct english words about this problem)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Essentially if you make a ball collide with a wall a few things could happen. Depending on the material of the ball it could have things ranging from no damage, to permanent significant deformation, to maybe even fracture. It just depends on the materials that compose the ball.
 
Thank you for your answer :)

So I'm thinking about tennis ball, so i think no permanent significant deformation.

So maybe, my goal is making a program with slow motion about the collide.
 
Ah, well I don't really have anything else in terms of actual data, however there is a professor at the University of Illinois that does some research on the physics of baseball, perhaps that's a good place to start. I think he also wrote a book about it part of which I think is dedicated to the deformation of the ball and the effects of it.
 
One thing to keep in mind is that hollow balls that bounce, like tennis balls, owe much of their elasticity to their tendency to return to their undeformed shapes like a spring would. If you smash two sliders on a linear air track together, they won't tend to have an elastic collision. But put springs on them and you will.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top