Understanding Charge: Types, Properties, and Mysteries Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter davon806
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
Click For Summary
Charge is a fundamental property of matter, categorized into positive and negative types, but its exact nature remains elusive. The discussion highlights that while physics can describe the behavior of charged particles, it cannot definitively explain what charge is or why it exists. The interaction between charged objects, such as attraction and repulsion, can be described through theories like quantum electrodynamics, but these are based on observations rather than fundamental explanations. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between "how" and "why" in physics, noting that the latter often delves into philosophical territory. Ultimately, the nature of charge and its existence raises complex questions that blend scientific inquiry with philosophical exploration.
davon806
Messages
147
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Charge is a physical property of matter.There are 2 types of charges,positive and negative.
However,what is charge?
We can see the effect of charge simply by taking a rod of hard rubber and rub it with fur.
But it appears that no one is able to define what exactly charge is.
Why did some subatomic particles possesses charges?Why does charge exists?
In addition,why there are only 2 types of charges,but not more?
Those questions really really confused me,can someone please explain them to me :( ?
Thx everyone.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
However,what is charge?
A property of particles.

Physics cannot answer "what" something is, that is philosophy. Physics gives a way to describe how something will behave.
 
Ok,I will try to accept it :O/,thx
There is still a question:
Could physics explain why 2 charged object will exert a force on each other?What causes them either to repel or attract?
 
Physics cannot explain "why" on a fundamental level. It can be described with very abstract theories (here: quantum electrodynamics), but those theories are always made to match the observations (like attracting and repelling charges).
 
A philisophical interjection !...Physics can 'answer' what...it does not require an answer, it is a description of observations.
Physics sets out to explain 'HOW' things happen.
Physics cannot answer 'WHY'... it is a bad question (God wills it to be so is the best answer)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K