Understanding Clopen Sets in X: A Wikipedia Example

Click For Summary
In the discussion about clopen sets in the space X, which consists of the intervals [0,1] and [2,3], it is clarified that both sets are clopen due to their disjoint nature. A set is considered clopen if its boundary is empty, which leads to confusion regarding the boundary of [0,1]. While the boundary of [0,1] in the real line R includes the points 0 and 1, in the subspace topology of X, these points do not belong to the boundary. This is because any open set in X containing 0 or 1 also includes points from the other interval [2,3], thus confirming that the boundary is empty in the context of X. The explanation resolves the initial confusion and highlights the importance of understanding boundaries within different topological spaces.
theneedtoknow
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
This isn't really a homework question, can someone just explain this bit from wikipedia?

consider the space X which consists of the union of the two intervals [0,1] and [2,3]. The topology on X is inherited as the subspace topology from the ordinary topology on the real line R. In X, the set [0,1] is clopen, as is the set [2,3]. This is a quite typical example: whenever a space is made up of a finite number of disjoint connected components in this way, the components will be clopen.

and later:

A set is clopen if and only if its boundary is empty.

Ok...so take the set [0,1] C X where X = [o,1]U[2,3]...how is the boundary of [0,1] empty? Isn't the boundary of [0,1] the 2 points 0 and 1? So I don't really get how [0,1] is clopen in this case
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the definition of boundary? Remember this is in the subspace topology and you shouldn't just think that your intuition about [0,1] being a subset of R is correct - after all [0,1] is open and closed...
 
Is 0 really in the boundary of [0,1]? By definition, it is so if every open set U of X containing 0 contains points of [0,1] and of X\[0,1]=[2,3]. Well, take for instance the open set (-1,1)nX=[0,1). It does not contain points of [2,3], so 0 is not in the boundary of X.

What happens here is that [0,1] has boundary {0,1} in R, but not in X.
 
Ah ok, thanks guys :) its more clear now
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K