Understanding Clopen Sets in X: A Wikipedia Example

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of clopen sets within a specific topological space, X, which is defined as the union of two intervals, [0,1] and [2,3]. Participants are exploring the properties of clopen sets and the definition of boundaries in the context of subspace topology.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the definition of the boundary of the set [0,1] and how it relates to the concept of clopen sets. There is an exploration of whether the boundary points 0 and 1 are indeed part of the boundary in the subspace topology of X.

Discussion Status

The discussion is progressing with participants clarifying definitions and exploring the implications of the subspace topology. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of boundaries in this specific context, leading to a better understanding for some participants.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the importance of considering the subspace topology rather than relying on intuition from the standard topology on the real line. This distinction is crucial for understanding the properties of clopen sets in this scenario.

theneedtoknow
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
This isn't really a homework question, can someone just explain this bit from wikipedia?

consider the space X which consists of the union of the two intervals [0,1] and [2,3]. The topology on X is inherited as the subspace topology from the ordinary topology on the real line R. In X, the set [0,1] is clopen, as is the set [2,3]. This is a quite typical example: whenever a space is made up of a finite number of disjoint connected components in this way, the components will be clopen.

and later:

A set is clopen if and only if its boundary is empty.

Ok...so take the set [0,1] C X where X = [o,1]U[2,3]...how is the boundary of [0,1] empty? Isn't the boundary of [0,1] the 2 points 0 and 1? So I don't really get how [0,1] is clopen in this case
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the definition of boundary? Remember this is in the subspace topology and you shouldn't just think that your intuition about [0,1] being a subset of R is correct - after all [0,1] is open and closed...
 
Is 0 really in the boundary of [0,1]? By definition, it is so if every open set U of X containing 0 contains points of [0,1] and of X\[0,1]=[2,3]. Well, take for instance the open set (-1,1)nX=[0,1). It does not contain points of [2,3], so 0 is not in the boundary of X.

What happens here is that [0,1] has boundary {0,1} in R, but not in X.
 
Ah ok, thanks guys :) its more clear now
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K