Understanding Electric Polarization in Dielectric Capacitors

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikitin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric Polarization
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric polarization density in a dielectric capacitor aligns with the direction of the electric field, as the electric dipole moment vector is influenced by the applied field. The relationship is defined by the equation \(\vec{P}=\chi_{\text{el}} \vec{E}\) for homogeneous isotropic media under static conditions. For time-dependent fields, the polarization is expressed in the frequency domain as \(\tilde{\vec{P}}(\omega,\vec{x})=\tilde{\chi}_{\text{el}}(\omega) \tilde{\vec{E}}(\omega,\vec{x})\), where \(\tilde{\chi}(\omega)\) is a holomorphic function in the upper complex \(\omega\)-half plane. This discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding electric susceptibility and its implications in dielectric materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric dipole moment and polarization
  • Familiarity with linear-response approximation in physics
  • Knowledge of electric susceptibility (\(\chi_{\text{el}}\))
  • Basic concepts of Fourier transforms in the context of time-dependent fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electric susceptibility in dielectric materials
  • Learn about the linear-response approximation and its applications
  • Explore the implications of time-dependent electric fields on polarization
  • Investigate Fourier transform techniques in physics for analyzing dynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and materials scientists interested in the behavior of dielectrics in capacitors and the underlying principles of electric polarization.

Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Does the electric polarization density of a dielectric inside a capacitor have the same direction as the electrical field? Considering the electric dipole moment vector goes from the - charge to + charge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, because the electrons in the dielectric are dragged a bit out of their equilibrium positions due to the applied electric field in the opposite direction than the field, because the force is [itex]\vec{F}=-e \vec{E}[/itex], where [itex]-e<0[/itex] is the electron's charge. The net effect (in lineare-response approximation) is an induced polarization
[tex]\vec{P}=\chi_{\text{el}} \vec{E}.[/tex] This is for homogeneous isotrophic media and time-independent (static) electric fields.

For time-dependent fields, this relation holds in the frequency domain, i.e., you have
[tex]\vec{P}(t,\vec{x})=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} t' \chi_{\text{el}}(t-t') \vec{E}(t',\vec{x}).[/tex]
The causality constraint, [itex]\chi_{\text{el}}(t-t') \propto \Theta(t-t')[/itex] makes the susceptibility to a retarded Green's function. In the frequency domain, i.e., for the Fourier transform of the quantities the above convolution integral translates into
[tex]\tilde{\vec{P}}(\omega,\vec{x})=\tilde{\chi}_{\text{el}}(\omega) \tilde{\vec{E}}(\omega,\vec{x}).[/tex]
The retardation condition makes [itex]\tilde{\chi}(\omega)[/itex] a holomorphic function in the upper complex [itex]\omega[/itex]-half plane, where use the usual physicist's convention for Fourier transforms between the time and frequency domain:
[tex]f(t)=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \frac{\mathrm{d} \omega}{2\pi} \tilde{f}(\omega) \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t).[/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K