Understanding Energy and Magnetism: Debunking Common Misconceptions

  • Thread starter Thread starter HummusAkemi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Stupid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies misconceptions about energy conservation in magnetic systems. When two magnets are pulled apart, work done on them increases the potential energy of the magnetic field, rather than resulting in energy loss. Each magnet gains potential energy equal to half the work done, contradicting the initial assumption of energy loss. The key point is that the energy stored in the magnetic field accounts for the work performed, aligning with conservation of energy principles. Understanding this distinction resolves the confusion regarding energy dynamics in magnet interactions.
HummusAkemi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I pry two magnets apart. The magnets attract each other. Say they exert a constant force F on each other. I exert an equivalent force F on each in the opposite direction and pull them apart a distance d (pull each of them d/2 distance). So I have done positive work Fd in total and increased the potential energy of the arrangement by Fd. The magnets have each done negative work -Fd/2 on each other.
Me: lost Fd energy
Left magnet: lost Fd/2 energy from work done on other magnet
Right magnet: lost Fd/2 energy from work done on other magnet
The potential energy of the arrangement rose by Fd.

Anyone tell me where I messed up? Because conservation of energy doesn't work out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnets have not lost any energy - you have done work storing energy in the magnetic field between the magnets.
The amount of energy stored is the same as the work you did.
 
Τhe middle statements about the left and right magnet are wrong. The left magnet doesn't lose Fd/2 energy instead it gains Fd/2 potential energy. Similar right magnet gains Fd/2 potential energy. It is a gain in potential energy rather than a gain in kinetic energy that we would have if there was no magnetic field. You view that "possible" gain in kinetic energy as a loss which isn't really an energy loss, it is a gain in potential energy instead.
 
Thanks, you two. Ok, I think I get it now
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top