Understanding Euler's Method & Estimating Area Enclosed

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding Euler's method in the context of solving a differential equation and estimating the area under a curve defined by that equation. Participants explore the relationship between the numerical approximation provided by Euler's method and the exact area enclosed by the curve, coordinate axes, and a vertical line.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the value y_{20} is considered an estimate of the area A, given that the initial conditions do not seem to be utilized in the provided answer.
  • Another participant clarifies that the initial condition is reflected in the limits of integration, specifically that the lower limit is x=0 and the upper limit corresponds to x_{20}=1, which is derived from the step size of 0.05.
  • There is a mention that had the step size been different, the corresponding 'y' value would also change, indicating a dependency on the step size and initial conditions.
  • A participant introduces the concept that Euler's method is a special case of Taylor's series, providing a broader mathematical context for the discussion.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the solution and the comments surrounding it, suggesting that the explanation may have obscured their understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of initial conditions in the approximation of area A by y_{20}. While some provide clarifications, there is no consensus on the interpretation of the relationship between y_{20} and A.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential ambiguities in the application of Euler's method and the interpretation of initial conditions, as well as the mathematical assumptions underlying the integration process.

Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am having trouble understanding a question in relation to Euler's method.

Basically, the question goes something like Euler's method is solved to solve the differential equation \frac{{dy}}{{dx}} = \log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right), with a step size of 0.05 and initial condition y = 0 when x = 0. Let A be magnitude of the area enclosed by the curve f\left( x \right) = \log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right), the coordinate axes and the line x = 1. Why is y_{20} an estimate of A?

Answer: y_{20} \approx \int\limits_0^{x_{20} } {\log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right)} dx = \int\limits_0^1 {\log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right)dx} = A

I do not understand the answer. As far as I understand, y_{20} is just the value of the antiderivative at x = 1, given initial conditions but the answer does not make use of the initial conditions. I do not see how y_{20} can be considered to be an approximation of A if the initial conditions are not used.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Benny said:
Hello, I am having trouble understanding a question in relation to Euler's method.

Basically, the question goes something like Euler's method is solved to solve the differential equation \frac{{dy}}{{dx}} = \log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right), with a step size of 0.05 and initial condition y = 0 when x = 0. Let A be magnitude of the area enclosed by the curve f\left( x \right) = \log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right), the coordinate axes and the line x = 1. Why is y_{20} an estimate of A?

Answer: y_{20} \approx \int\limits_0^{x_{20} } {\log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right)} dx = \int\limits_0^1 {\log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right)dx} = A

I do not understand the answer. As far as I understand, y_{20} is just the value of the antiderivative at x = 1, given initial conditions but the answer does not make use of the initial conditions. I do not see how y_{20} can be considered to be an approximation of A if the initial conditions are not used.

1.A=:\int_{0}^{1} \ln(4-x^{2}) dx
2.The initial condition imposed on the solution of the ODE is reflected in the limits of integration.Namely the inferior limit is chosen x=0 and the superior one corresponds to x_{20}=20\cdot 0.05=1,where i made use of the fact that the step size is 0.05.So the initial conditions are used and the fact that y_{20} and not other 'y' gives u the approximatimation is due to the fact that the initial condition is y(x=0)=0 and the step is 0.05.Had the step been 0.01,you would have found x=1 for x_{100} and similar the corresponding 'y'.

Daniel.
 
I see what you mean. I was thinking about it along those lines but I probably thought about the comments included with the solution too much which obscured by understanding of the solution. Thanks for your help.
 
In addition, Euler's method is a special case of the "Taylor's series" method.

Suppose the differential equation is dy/dx= f(x,y).

The general definition of Taylor's series for an infinitely differentiable function y, about x0 is y(x0)+ y'(x0)(x- x0+ (1/2)y"(x0)(x-x0)+ ...
If x- x0= h (so that x= x0+h) is small then the higher powers of (x-x0) will be "negligible" and we have y(x0+h)= y(x0)+ f(x0,y(x0))(x-x0) so that
δy= y(x0+h)- y(x0)= f(x0,y(x0))h.

If you have a way of evaluating df(x,y)/dx (you will need to use the chain rule), you can get a better approximation by y(x0+h)= y(x0)+ f(x0,y(x0))h+ (1/2)(df(x0,y(x0))/dx)h2.
 
Thanks for posting the extra information.
 
Benny said:
Hello, I am having trouble understanding a question in relation to Euler's method.

Basically, the question goes something like Euler's method is solved to solve the differential equation \frac{{dy}}{{dx}} = \log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right), with a step size of 0.05 and initial condition y = 0 when x = 0. Let A be magnitude of the area enclosed by the curve f\left( x \right) = \log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right), the coordinate axes and the line x = 1. Why is y_{20} an estimate of A?

Answer: y_{20} \approx \int\limits_0^{x_{20} } {\log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right)} dx = \int\limits_0^1 {\log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right)dx} = A

I do not understand the answer. As far as I understand, y_{20} is just the value of the antiderivative at x = 1, given initial conditions but the answer does not make use of the initial conditions. I do not see how y_{20} can be considered to be an approximation of A if the initial conditions are not used.

2002 VCE Specialist Maths exam Benny?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K