Undergrad Understanding Fourier Transforms

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding Fourier transforms in the context of analyzing electrical signals using LabView. The user is investigating how varying the sampling time affects the width of the signal peak in the frequency domain, noting an inversely proportional relationship. They seek clarification on the algorithmic process behind the Fourier transform calculations, particularly regarding how input voltage values are transformed into amplitude values. The user expresses a desire for insights into both the sampling effects and the computational methodology of the Fourier transform. Overall, the thread aims to deepen the understanding of Fourier transforms and their practical applications in signal analysis.
MxwllsPersuasns
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

First time poster here so please excuse any mistakes as I'm unfamiliar with the conventions of this forum. Also before I get started I'd like to say I wasn't sure exactly where a question like this would go; I debated in the Math Programs and Latex section but figured general physics would find it the most exposure.

So I am currently working in a lab as an undergraduate assistant and much of my work involves/will involve analyzing the Fourier transforms of various electrical signals. To do this I am utilizing LabView; so our signal comes in and is displayed on a waveform graph then runs through the 'FFT' tool in LabView and the output (the transform) is displayed on a second graph with a numerical indicator array to view the particular values. My goal currently is to understand and be able to interpret a Fourier transformed waveform -- or as my professor put it "Determine, quantitatively, how to go from analog voltage to the Fourier Spectrum plotted by LabView".

Given this; I have some background knowledge I'd like to lay out to help contextualize my issue and also some specific questions I'm hoping someone can help me tackle from another angle or shed some light on;

So I know that (in essence) a Fourier Transform decomposes a time varying signal in the time domain to it's constituent trigonometric functions in the frequency domain. I was playing around with a 1V, 102Hz signal being generated from a function generator today by varying the sample rate and the number of samples (essentially varying the sampling time) and noticed that there was an inversely proportional relationship between the sampling time and the width of the 102Hz signal peak, so that, for example, if I halved the sampling time from 1s to .5s I notice that my width increases to 150%, the progression down to fractional integer times (1/n; 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, etc...) did not seem to be linear however. I was wondering if anyone might be able to shine a bit more light on this relationship or at least point me in the right direction?

Finally I have a very limited understanding of what's going on inside the software to compute the transformed values, I believe it goes something like this; First, each value in the array for the input voltage gets put through the transformation formula which produces a complex # for each value then, I believe, the complex numbers get absolute valued then squared in order to produce a real-valued number and that is what is plotted as the amplitude against the frequency. So thus if the value of the input voltage is in units of Volts then the value of the amplitudes would be in units of Volts^2. Can anyone tell me if this is correct? On the right path? Or am I completely off-base? Any insight or help into these two main issues (especially the latter -- about how the values are computed algorithmically) would be incredibly valued and appreciated. Thanks guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K