Understanding Gaussian Beam Contraction and Divergence in Optics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of Gaussian beams in optics, specifically focusing on the concepts of beam contraction and divergence. Participants explore both the mathematical expressions related to Gaussian beams and the physical interpretations of these phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Zeb questions the interpretation of the q parameter in relation to the field amplitude E and its decrease with distance, expressing confusion about the contraction of the Gaussian beam without the aid of a lens.
  • Another participant suggests that while a collimated beam always expands, certain conditions can lead to beams that contract to a minimum diameter before expanding again, mentioning lenses and Fabry-Pérot laser beams as examples.
  • Zeb inquires about the Helmholtz equation and seeks a solution that represents a beam with non-uniform intensity and non-plane phase fronts, proposing a complex function and asking for clarification on the necessity of using complex functions.
  • A later reply indicates that using complex functions for psi is generally easier in optics, referencing further discussion in another thread.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of Gaussian beams, particularly regarding contraction and the role of lenses. There is no consensus on the necessity of complex functions in representing certain beam profiles, as Zeb's inquiry remains open-ended.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of Gaussian beams and the conditions under which they contract or diverge. There are unresolved mathematical aspects related to the Helmholtz equation and the representation of beam profiles.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in optics, particularly those exploring Gaussian beams, their mathematical representations, and the physical implications of beam behavior.

zebanaqvi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am new to lasers. In the expression for q parameter, 1/q = 1/R - j(λ/πw^2)
how did we come to know that w(z) is a measure of decrease in field amplitude E with distance? I can't feel it.

Does the gaussian beam itself contract to the minimum diameter? Shouldn't a lens be required for this? I can understand the divergence of the beam but not the contraction.

Can anybody please make me understand both mathematically and physically?
Regards,
Zeb
 
Science news on Phys.org
if you "start" with a collimated beam, then it will always expand in diameter.

but sometimes for a variety of reasons you can get a beam that will have beams with decreasing diameter as it propagates until it forms the beams waist and start to expand again.
Such beams are easily created, like you said, with lenses. fabry-perot laser beams sometimes come with a decreasing diameter probably due to the non linearity of the components in the resonator.

does that answer your question?
 
Thanks a lot :)
Sorry, what I am about to ask might be lame.
I have the helmholtz equation, and I want to solution to represent a beam whose phase front is not plane always, whose intensity profile is not uniform across the cross section. What function should I try out? You'll say complex. Something like psi(x,y,z)exp(-jkz) where psi is a complex function. Please explain me why should psi be complex? Is it that only a complex function will be able to represent the desired beam? y?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K