Understanding GPE to KE Conversion on a Ramp | Simplified Physics Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter TerryB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gpe Ramp
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conversion of gravitational potential energy (GPE) to kinetic energy (KE) in a ball rolling down a ramp. The participant correctly derives the equation mgh = (1/2)mv², simplifying it to gh = (1/2)v², and subsequently to 2gh = v². Despite expecting a curved graph due to the quadratic relationship between height and velocity, the participant observes a straight line, attributing this to the shallow curve of the ramp. The confusion regarding the notation v² is clarified, emphasizing the importance of accurate mathematical representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (GPE)
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy (KE) concepts
  • Basic knowledge of algebraic manipulation
  • Experience with graphing functions and interpreting results
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the relationship between GPE and KE in different scenarios
  • Learn about graphing quadratic functions and their characteristics
  • Investigate the effects of ramp angle on energy conversion
  • Study the use of spreadsheet functions for mathematical modeling
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding energy conversion principles in mechanics, particularly in the context of ramps and motion.

TerryB
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok now my problem is this- Ignoring resistances (I'm factoring these in later), if a ball rolls down a ramp the initial GPE energy goes to KE.

So the equation would be mgh=(1/2)mv*2 so mass cancels out leaving gh=(1/2)v*2
multiply by two gives 2gh=v*2.

So I have plotted a graph of change in height by Velocity and resulted in a straight line graph. I'd have thought this was wrong as by the equation above the change in height is proportional to velocity squared so should it not be a curve?

There's probably something completely stupid I'm doing but I've been doing Physics for 6 days straight so my mind's gone blank.

Any help is much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what language you used, but usually v*2 means v times 2, multiply, not exponentiate. If you're using a spreadsheet, it should have some type of power() function.
 
Oops my bad! As I said I'm tired :p I meant to say v^2

And I've done it by hand but its still a straight line. I have a feeling its because the curve is rather shallow so it is hard to see it on my graph.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K