Understanding Inner Product on C[a,b] vs C(R)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of inner products in the context of continuous functions defined on specific intervals versus those defined on the entire real line. The original poster is trying to understand why the integral defined as \(\int_{a}^{b}f(x)g(x) dx\) qualifies as an inner product on the space of continuous functions on the interval [a,b], but not on the space of continuous functions over all of \(\mathbb{R}\).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the definition of continuous functions on \(\mathbb{R}\) and how they relate to those on [a,b]. They express confusion regarding the positivity axiom of inner products and seek clarification on counterexamples. Other participants suggest specific functions that illustrate the failure of the inner product condition on \(\mathbb{R}\).

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's confusion, providing examples and clarifications regarding the properties of functions that affect the inner product definition. There is recognition of the misunderstanding regarding the bounds of integration and the implications for the inner product.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the distinction between functions defined on a finite interval versus those defined on the entire real line, particularly regarding the implications for the inner product properties. The discussion reflects a need for clarity on the definitions and properties of continuous functions in different contexts.

Redukt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
My apologies in advance for asking what (to me) looks like an extremely stupid question, but I just can't figure it out.

1. Homework Statement :
Where is this an inner product:
[tex]\int_{a}^{b}f(x)g(x) dx[/tex]

a) on C[a,b]?
b) on C(R)?

The answer is that it is an inner product on a), but not on b) - apparently on b) the axiom of positivity fails. I do not understand how this is possible, since all functions that are C(R) are also C[a,b] - or have I just always misunderstood this notation? Does not C(R) mean "functions continuous on all of R"?

Homework Equations



This is what the answer key says: It fails on b) because [tex]\exists f \ne 0 : \Vert f \Vert^2 = 0[/tex]

3. The Attempt at a Solution :

has mainly consisted of trying (unsuccessfully) to work backwards towards a counterexample. I don't know how to do this in any other, more general way, since the whole idea seems illogical to me. Please enlighten me, somebody?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The inner product of the function [tex]f(x) = \sqrt{x}[/tex] is zero and this f is not the zero function.
 
Any continuous function that is 0 on [a,b], but not anywhere else. sqrt(x) doesn't work for arbitrary a,b, but a simple piecewise function that looks similar to the absolute value function would.
 
Vid said:
Any continuous function that is 0 on [a,b], but not anywhere else. sqrt(x) doesn't work for arbitrary a,b, but a simple piecewise function that looks similar to the absolute value function would.

What are you talking about? The inproduct of sqrt(x) delivers x if you integrate this from -inf to +inf you'll get zero, right?
 
It's not from -inf to inf. It's from a to b. The reason the integral from a to b isn't an inner product on C(R) is because there is an f in C(R) such that it's integral from a to b is zero, but f is not zero everywhere.
 
Vid said:
It's not from -inf to inf. It's from a to b. The reason the integral from a to b isn't an inner product on C(R) is because there is an f in C(R) such that it's integral from a to b is zero, but f is not zero everywhere.

Yes you're right I didn't read well enough. The integral has bounds form a to b.
 
Vid said:
Any continuous function that is 0 on [a,b], but not anywhere else. sqrt(x) doesn't work for arbitrary a,b, but a simple piecewise function that looks similar to the absolute value function would.

I think this is occasion for a big *headdesk* (on my own behalf, obviously). How did I not see this? Thanks a lot. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K