Understanding Integration by Parts in Quantum Field Theory

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
looseleaf
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Hello, I'm just starting Zee's QFT in a Nutshell, I'm a bit confused about what he means by "integate by parts under the d4x". Can someone explain what he means by this? I understand how to obtain the Klein-Gordon equation from the free particle Lagrangian density, but not sure why he invokes integration by parts.
Thanks!
Screen Shot 2019-03-22 at 7.57.24 PM.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-03-22 at 7.57.24 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-03-22 at 7.57.24 PM.png
    22 KB · Views: 896
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you have a ##(\partial \varphi)(\partial \varphi)## term, but ##\varphi\partial ^2 \varphi## is more useful later.

Both arise from the derivative of ##(\varphi)(\partial \varphi)## and that should go to zero for large ##\phi##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DarMM
To expand on what @mfb said.

We have:
$$\partial_{\mu}\left(\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi\right) = \partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi + \phi\partial^{2}\phi$$
Under the integral:
$$\int{\partial_{\mu}\left(\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi\right)d^{4}x} = \int{\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi \hspace{1pt} d^{4}x} + \int{\phi\partial^{2}\phi \hspace{1pt} d^{4}x}$$
So assuming the left-hand side vanishes we'd have:
$$\int{\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi \hspace{1pt} d^{4}x} = - \int{\phi\partial^{2}\phi \hspace{1pt} d^{4}x}$$
which is exactly the replacement made in Zee.

Since the LHS term is just a surface term it should vanish if the fields decay rapidly. They do, but proving so is a good bit beyond a text like Zee. Basically you'd have to prove a randomly selected field decays at infinity with probability ##1##.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mfb