Understanding Kinematics for Inertial to Body Conversion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of modeling kinematics for an inertial navigation system using Simulink, particularly the conversion from inertial to body coordinates. The user seeks clarification on how to transform initial position and velocity into inertial coordinates and the necessity of this conversion. It is emphasized that working in an inertial coordinate system simplifies the process due to conservation laws and the absence of fictitious forces. The conversation also touches on the integration of body accelerations to derive inertial position and orientation. Overall, a clear understanding of quaternion rotations and the steps involved in the conversion process is crucial for successful simulation.
Pikapi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey Everyone,

I basically need a crash course on kinematics as I am trying to model this in simulink. I am given an intial set of position, velocity, ECI to Body Quaternion and suppose to convert into rotational rate and linear acceleration. Can anyone explain what i need to do? I tried looking it up but honestly the equations are above me. It seems that I am also suppose to convert from inertial to body but i am not sure why and how i am suppose to do this. I'm an EE and not mechanical so please bear with me, it's been a while since i worked with this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess I should also explain that this is to simulate an inertial navigation system.
 
If you don't understand how quaternion rotations work, you have two options. Either learn linear algebra, which will take a while, or find someone else to do the work for you. There is no shortcut for this problem.
 
Actually i do know how to work with linear algebra, but I'm confused on what steps I need to take. For example, when given an initial position and velocity, do we need to first transform them into inertial coordinates and why do we need them in inertial coordinates?
 
It's always easier to work with these things in inertial coordinate system. For one thing, you have conservation laws on your side. For another, no fictitious forces.

So what exactly do you have, in terms of running variables, and what exactly are you trying to do? Usually, INS gives you body accelerations and you integrate these to inertial position and orientation. Is that what you are trying to do, or are you trying to solve the reverse problem? Given coordinates/orientation try to simulate what INS is going to measure?
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top