Understanding Lift Generated by Rowing Blades

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aeb2335
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lift
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of lift generated by rowing blades and how it relates to the motion of the blades through water. Participants explore the mechanics of fluid dynamics involved in rowing, including the definitions of lift and drag, and the implications for optimizing blade design. The conversation touches on both theoretical and practical aspects of rowing performance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how lift can be generated when the motion of the blade is largely perpendicular to its leading edge, suggesting that the flow generating lift may depend on the horizontal component of water flow.
  • Another participant defines "lift" as the component of fluid dynamic force perpendicular to the relative fluid flow, noting that while drag may dominate, lift could still be significant during certain phases of the stroke.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that the primary force propelling the boat is drag, resulting from pushing the oar blade backwards through the water, while lift and vortices may play a secondary role.
  • One participant speculates that high-performance blades may be curved, potentially creating low pressure on the forward-facing surface, which could be interpreted as lift, thereby reducing slippage through the water.
  • Another participant points out that the oar experiences a small angle of attack during much of the stroke, which could contribute to lift generation.
  • A later reply suggests that the right shape of the blade could effectively lower pressure on the convex side, thereby reducing slippage, and contrasts the performance of racing blades with conventional oars used on heavier boats.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of lift versus drag in rowing, with no consensus on the significance of lift in the context of rowing blade design and performance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent to which lift contributes to propulsion.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge varying definitions of lift and drag, and the discussion reflects uncertainty about the mechanics of fluid dynamics as they apply to rowing blades. There are also references to assumptions about blade shape and performance that are not fully explored.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in rowing mechanics, fluid dynamics, and the design of rowing equipment may find this discussion relevant.

aeb2335
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Here is my question:

To my understanding aerofoils on an airplane air flow moves (horizontally) in the same direction as the motion of the aircraft; the aero foil then creates a pressure difference and an unbalanced force and lift is generated. Rowing blade manufacturers throughout their literature (see link below) talk about lift and angle of attack etc. What I do not understand is that how can you have lift when the direction of motion (the path the blade goes through the water) is largely perpendicular to the leading edge of the blade? Or is the flow that generates lift simply a function of the horizontal component of the water that flows over the blade. Any insight (or things to further research) and how one could being to optimize a blade would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks so much

Disclaimer: I have not taken fluids yet

Link:

http://www.concept2.com/us/oars/pursuit/blade_path.asp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
"Lift" is usually defined as the component of the fluiddynamic force perpendicular to the relative fluid flow. The parallel component is called "drag". Even if most of the force on the paddle is drag, there might be a significant lift in some phases of the stroke.

But they also might mean something completely different by "lift", like the vertical to surface component.
 
I agree with post #2. The "lift force" and vortices are not the the main forces propelling the boat, though optimizing them may be a useful secondary effect.

The main force is actually the drag force caused by trying to push a flat plate (the oar blade) backwards through the water, perpendicular to the surface of the plate. The oar works as a lever to transfer the force to the boat. Since a racing boat is much more streamlined than the oar blades, the boat moves forwards much further than the oar blade moves backwards, relative to the water. If you row a heavy dinghy with short oars, the opposite is true!

You can easily see the small amount of motion of the oars trelative to the water if you look at a rowing eight traveling at racing speed. The oars enter and leave the water almost vertically relative to the water, and at every stroke the 8 oars enter a new undisturbed section of water and leave a set of small vortices when they leave the water. Presumably the improved oar design minimizes the energy that is wasted in creating those vortices.
 
I would normally be skeptical of manufacturer's blurb but, bearing in mind that there are a lot of quite bright Engineering and Science types involved in rowing, I guess there may be something in the concept of 'lift'. I think that high performance blades are, in fact, curved. The turbulence would produce low pressure on the forward facing surface of the oar, which would reduce slippage through the water. You 'could' call that lift.
 
If you look at the direction of incoming water that the oar sees, it's clear the oar has a small angle of attack much of the time.
attachment.php?attachmentid=37958&stc=1&d=1313187270.png
 

Attachments

  • oars.png
    oars.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 776
That looks pretty convincing - possible the actual range of angles could be a bit smaller. It is reasonable to suppose that the right shape of curve could produce a useful lowering of pressure on the convex side of the blade - so less slippage. I use a pair of conventional 'seagoing' oars on my 10' tender. They do slip quite a lot - but then, the boat itself is relatively like a brick, compared with a rowing 8. The length of a racing blade will be much greater so that the speed of the boat relative to the stationary (in the water) blade can be high. (A distance multiplier type of lever)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
26K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K