Understanding Minkowski Space-time: An Explanation of Time as a Dimension

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the complexities of understanding Minkowski space-time and its implications for special relativity. The user grapples with the concept of time as a dimension, particularly how events are perceived in relation to their spatial and temporal coordinates. The Minkowski formula, S² = X² + Y² + Z² - (CT)², is introduced to quantify the separation between events in four-dimensional space-time. The user struggles with the interpretation of simultaneity and the mathematical representation of events, leading to confusion about the nature of time and distance in this framework.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski space-time and its mathematical representation.
  • Familiarity with the concept of four-vectors in special relativity.
  • Knowledge of the speed of light as a constant in physics.
  • Basic grasp of simultaneity and its implications in different reference frames.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Minkowski space-time formula.
  • Learn about the concept of simultaneity in special relativity and its effects on event perception.
  • Explore the implications of light cones and causality in Minkowski space-time.
  • Read foundational texts on special relativity, such as Einstein's "Relativity: The Special and the General Theory."
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying special relativity, educators explaining the concepts of space-time, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of modern physics.

  • #31
calebhoilday said:
As this interval separates events
As evidenced by the fact that S2 can be positive, zero or negative, and the fact that it can be zero without the two events being equal, it's not a measure of how "big" the separation is.

calebhoilday said:
Considering event A to be the take off and event B to be the deceleration, does the difference in duration between event A and event B, for the spacecraft (1 year) and the space station (2 years), hold any significance?
Yes. To see this clearly, have the spaceship do the same thing again, but in the opposite direction. When it gets back to the space station, everyone on the station have aged 4 years, and everyone on the ship has aged 2 years. This is because human bodies can be thought of as really crappy clocks, and a clock measures the proper time of the curve in spacetime that represents its motion. (Note that there are lots of threads about this scenario already. This is a recent one).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I get the twins paradox. I was wondering if Lorentz transformations affect the co-ordinates. Event A say happens in 2010 to both the the spaceship and the space station, when does event B happen? Would the spacecraft consider it to be 2011 and the space station consider it to be 2012?
 
  • #33
calebhoilday said:
I get the twins paradox. I was wondering if Lorentz transformations affect the co-ordinates. Event A say happens in 2010 to both the the spaceship and the space station, when does event B happen? Would the spacecraft consider it to be 2011 and the space station consider it to be 2012?
The space station would. To the people on the spacecraft , 1 year has passed since 2010. If they would say that the year is 2011 is another matter. It wouldn't make much sense to say that, because then they should also say that it's 2012 when they get back home and meet all the people who live in 2014.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
82
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K