Understanding Multiple Harmonics in Sound Quality

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hlud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quality Sound
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the presence of multiple harmonics in sound quality, particularly in relation to strings and tubes. Participants explore the implications of harmonics on timbre, the generation of sound, and the subjective nature of sound quality. The conversation includes inquiries about visual representations of harmonics and the differences in sound characteristics across various instruments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that multiple harmonics are inherently present in sound, especially when a string is plucked, making it difficult to isolate only the fundamental frequency.
  • One participant describes a specific musical example where a guitarist isolates harmonics by touching the strings at certain nodes, effectively highlighting specific harmonics while suppressing others.
  • Another participant mentions that the harmonics in many musical instruments are not always harmonically related to the fundamental note, particularly in wind instruments.
  • There is a discussion about the subjective nature of sound quality, with some participants interpreting "quality" as measurable characteristics while others emphasize its subjective perception.
  • Some participants question the terminology used, such as the meaning of "quality" versus "timbre," and whether these terms can be quantified or are inherently subjective.
  • One participant suggests that the term "quality" can be misleading and proposes that a spectrogram might be a more accurate representation of sound characteristics.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the basic definitions and measurements of sound quality and timbre, with some asserting that it is not a matter of good or bad but rather a means of differentiation between sounds.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the definitions of sound quality and timbre, with multiple competing views on their subjective nature and how they should be measured or interpreted. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the terminology and the implications of harmonics in sound.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of sound characteristics and the limitations of common terminology in specific contexts. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in definitions and the subjective nature of sound quality assessments.

Hlud
Messages
72
Reaction score
6
For the quality, or timbre, of sound, multiple harmonics are present. How is that possible for a string or a tube? Are there any good pictures of how a wave on a string has multiple harmonics present at the same time? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The number of harmonics present will depend on how the sound is generated. If you pluck a string, it is very difficult to do it in such a way that only the fundamental is vibrating.
 
Hlud said:
For the quality, or timbre, of sound, multiple harmonics are present. How is that possible for a string or a tube?

Not only is it possible, sometimes, on some instruments, the higher harmonics are dominant.

Here is a song, Roundabout, by Yes. In the introduction the guitarists isolates various harmonics on the strings by placing a finger of his fretting hand at certain "nodes," thus isolating the desired harmonics (That's not done for the entire introduction, but it is done about 5 times or so, sometimes with multiple strings at once.) He's not actually fretting the strings, he is merely strumming open strings open while briefly touching the strings at certain locations to isolate the particular harmonics. These harmonics would normally be there anyway, but what he's effectively done is removed all or most of the other harmonics, including the fundamental of each string.



Are there any good pictures of how a wave on a string has multiple harmonics present at the same time? Thanks.

Here is a video that plays various sounds and let's you "see" the waveform using an oscilloscope.

 
Hlud said:
For the quality, or timbre, of sound, multiple harmonics are present. How is that possible for a string or a tube? Are there any good pictures of how a wave on a string has multiple harmonics present at the same time? Thanks.
For many musical instruments, the 'harmonics' you refer to are far from harmonically related to the fundamental note. Strings are pretty well behaved because they are well clamped at each end but many wind instruments are far from perfect. The high components of notes are referred to as Overtones and these overtones strongly define the timbre of an instrument. Early synthesisers were based on mixtures of harmonics and had their own characteristic sounds. Interesting and pleasant sounds but nothing like the 'Instrument' labels that were on the tabs. The synthesisers which use samples will sound more 'real' but they mostly vary the pitch by altering the replay speed of a single note. This, again, is not realistic because the different registers of most instruments have a different timbre.
So the geometrical shapes that appear in the movies (above) would not appear on the waveforms from real instruments. Even the waveforms from a guitar string do not have regular patterns and the higher spectral components (approximate harmonics) run through the trace, never producing a well behaved and long lasting wave shape.
 
What does quality sound mean?

Sounds subjective?
 
houlahound said:
What does quality sound mean?

Sounds subjective?
When you hear it, it is subjective.
I interpreted the word "quality" as "characteristics" - which are measurable.
 
Assuming pure tones are high quality??
 
houlahound said:
Assuming pure tones are high quality??
That wouldn't be a 'musical' high quality. It could indicate a reasonable 'quality' of amplifier or recording, with a sine wave input.
A good violin will produce a very 'impure' spectrum and so will a rubbish violin.
 
So then what exactly are we discussing??
 
  • #10
houlahound said:
So then what exactly are we discussing??
Timbre? That's only got one meaning and it's in the OP.
 
  • #11
houlahound said:
So then what exactly are we discussing??

OED said:
12. Chiefly Music. That which distinguishes sounds from other sounds sharing the same pitch and other quantitative features; timbre.
 
  • #12
K, I have not read up on the musical aspects of sound so not familiar with this term, what's the difference between good quality/timbre and bad quality/timbre and what units is it measured in.
 
  • #13
houlahound said:
K, I have not read up on the musical aspects of sound so not familiar with this term, what's the difference between good quality/timbre and bad quality/timbre and what units is it measured in.
It is not "good" or "bad." It is what allows you to differentiate between a guitar, a piano, and a human voice playing the same note.
 
  • #14
Well quality is kind of a misleading word. Its really a spectrogram?
 
  • #15
houlahound said:
K, I have not read up on the musical aspects of sound so not familiar with this term, what's the difference between good quality/timbre and bad quality/timbre and what units is it measured in.
No units - except £ and $, afaik. It's in the same street as art and taste - there is usually some agreement between experts about really good and really bad but it's too subjective to quantify.
But the OP is asking a much more basic question and that is about the frequency analysis of sounds from strings. I would have expected anyone who wanted pictures of that would try googling first and find something to suit their particular level of enquiry. I could suggest A google search with key words like: Frequency spectrum of string vibrations.
 
  • #17
houlahound said:
Well quality is kind of a misleading word.
So are a lot of "common words" when used in certain specific fields. Consider "color" and quarks, for example. o0)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K